Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
Published on: October 21, 2016
Modeling Gaseous CO2 Flow Behavior in Layered Basalts: Dimensional Analysis and Aquifer Response
Andrea D'Aniello1, Sigrún Tómasdóttir2, Bergur Sigfússon2
1Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, via Claudio 21, 80125, Naples, Italy.
Geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) risks CO2 leakage, potentially contaminating water. Our model shows gaseous CO2 migration depends on geology, not groundwater flow, with significant leakage possible from well failures.
Area of Science:
- Earth Sciences
- Environmental Engineering
- Geology
Background:
- Geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) is crucial for climate change mitigation.
- Potential leakage of stored carbon dioxide (CO2) poses risks to underground drinking water sources and sequestration efficacy.
- Understanding the multiphase flow behavior of gaseous CO2 is essential for assessing leakage risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model a hypothetical gaseous CO2 leak from a well integrity failure in a GCS operation.
- To analyze the factors influencing CO2 migration in the subsurface.
- To quantify potential CO2 release volumes and understand pressure dynamics during leakage.
Main Methods:
- Numerical simulation of a gaseous CO2 leak scenario at the Hellisheiði (CarbFix2) GCS site.
- Analysis of CO2 plume migration influenced by formation stratigraphy, permeability, and retention properties.
- Dimensional analysis to compare buoyant, viscous, and capillary forces.
Main Results:
- Gaseous CO2 migration is primarily controlled by geological formations and retention properties, with minimal impact from groundwater hydraulic gradients.
- Potential atmospheric release of 18.3% and 30.6% of injected CO2 over 3 days in different scenarios.
- Significant aquifer pressure buildups observed, exacerbated by less conductive layers.
- Buoyant and viscous forces found to be comparable within gaseous plumes over time.
Conclusions:
- Subsurface CO2 leakage is complex, influenced by multiple forces including pressure gradients, buoyancy, viscosity, and capillary effects.
- Accurate prediction of CO2 flow behavior requires considering all relevant forces; neglecting any can lead to flawed interpretations and operational decisions.
- This study highlights the importance of robust well integrity and comprehensive modeling for safe GCS operations.
Related Concept Videos
Turbulent Flow: Problem Solving
Temperature is a key factor in CO2 solubility. In this case, the CO2 gas and the liquid are cooled to 20°C. Lower temperatures enhance...
Typical Model Studies
Dimensional Analysis
In fluid mechanics, dimensional...
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Uniform Depth Channel Flow: Problem Solving
Rapidly Varying Flow

