Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 15, 2025
Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Reaching performance scale for stroke - Test-retest reliability, measurement error, concurrent and discriminant
Sandeep K Subramanian1,2, Melanie C Baniña2,3, Andrea Turolla4
1Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Introduction:
Post-stroke upper limb motor improvement can be better quantified by describing movement patterns characterizing movement quality and use of compensations. Movement patterns can be described using both kinematic and clinical outcomes. One clinical outcome that assesses movement quality and compensations used for reaching a Close (18 points) and Far target (18 points) is the Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke (RPSS).
Objective:
To estimate the pilot test-retest reliability and validity (concurrent, discriminant) of the RPSS in individuals with chronic stroke.
Design:
Retrospective data analysis.
Setting:
Research laboratory.
Participants:
Seventy-two individuals with upper limb hemiparesis ≥6 months prior to participation.
Intervention:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measure:
RPSS Close and Far Target scores. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) helped assess pilot test-retest reliability on a subset of 14 participants. Concurrent validity was assessed for individual RPSS items with corresponding kinematic outcomes (trunk displacement, shoulder flexion, shoulder horizontal adduction, elbow extension, trajectory straightness) using Pearson correlations. We also ran multiple regression analyses with the RPSS total scores and used kinematic outcomes as the criterion standard. Logistic regression analyses estimated discriminant validity. We divided participants into two groups based on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scores (mild: ≥50/66; moderate-to-severe: ≤49/66).
Results:
Test-retest reliability was excellent for Close (ICC = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-0.99) and Far targets (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-0.99). Individual RPSS items for both targets were mildly to moderately correlated with corresponding kinematic values. A combination of trajectory straightness, elbow extension, and trunk displacement explained the majority of the variance in RPSS scores (47%) for both targets. The RPSS scores discriminated between individuals with mild and moderate-to-severe motor impairment for both Close (ExpB = 3.33, P < .001; 95% CI 1.70-6.52) and Far targets (ExpB = 2.59, P < .001, 95% CI 1.65-4.07). Cutoff points for transition between groups were 15.5 (Close target) and 14 (Far target).
Conclusion:
The RPSS is a valid clinical measure with excellent pilot results of test-retest reliability for assessing movement patterns and compensations used for reaching.
