Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

RNAscope for In situ Detection of Transcriptionally Active Human Papillomavirus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: March 11, 2014
Misclassifications in human papillomavirus databases
Laila Sara Arroyo Mühr1, Carina Eklund1, Joakim Dillner2
1International HPV Reference Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract:
We assessed the quality of human papillomavirus (HPV) sequences in GenBank by analyzing the possible presence of chimeras, "wrong-assembled" contigs and errors in taxonomy using an open-source script (HPVChimera_Gb) that compared 25 638 HPV-related nucleotide sequences in GenBank with the 221 numbered HPV types and another 220 complete HPV sequences. There were 110 sequences with taxonomy/naming errors (sequences reported as another HPV type than the one they corresponded to) and 1318 possibly chimeric sequences. Manual analysis found plausible explanations for most of them (e.g. sequence covering an integration site) but 114 sequences appeared to be chimeras (96/114 were already flagged as "unverified" by GenBank) and 13 had taxonomy/naming errors. When comparing all correct HPV sequences in GenBank, there appeared to exist about 800 unique putative HPV types. Systematic and regular work towards eliminating chimeric sequences and taxonomy/naming errors could increase the quality and order in HPV research.

