Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Focusing of Light in the Eye01:16

Focusing of Light in the Eye

3.9K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of early postoperative dry eye after KLEx and FS-LASIK: a contralateral eye study.

BMC ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Development of an excel-based decision support tool for graves orbitopathy.

Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

The deviation between achieved net corneal thinning and predicted lenticule thickness after keratorefractive lenticule extraction surgery.

International ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Results of Keratopigmentation with a Novel Technique Using a Microneedling Device: Dermapen.

Cornea·2026
Same author

Choroidal vascular alterations in patients with Helicobacter pylori gastritis.

Arab journal of gastroenterology : the official publication of the Pan-Arab Association of Gastroenterology·2025
Same author

Topical insulin treatment efficacy in rat corneal epithelial wound healing model and comparison of efficacy with topical hyaluronate treatment.

Experimental eye research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

311

Comparison of refractive outcomes using Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry or IOLMaster 700 keratometry for

Mustafa Aksoy1, Leyla Asena2, Sirel Gür Güngör2

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Yüksek Ihtisas University, Ankara, Turkey. mustafa-aksoy@hotmail.com.

International Ophthalmology
|March 18, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Both Pentacam equivalent keratometry readings (EKR) and IOLMaster 700 keratometry (K) values provide comparable outcomes for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations. The IOLMaster 700 K values with the Holladay-II formula offered the most accurate refractive prediction.

Keywords:
Cataract surgeryEquivalent keratometry readingsIOLMaster 700Optical BiometryPentacam

More Related Videos

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.8K
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

311
Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
06:55

Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses

Published on: June 6, 2017

7.8K
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Optics

Background:

  • Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is crucial for achieving desired postoperative refractive outcomes in cataract surgery.
  • Keratometry measurements are a key input for modern IOL power calculation formulas.
  • Comparing different keratometry devices and measurement zones is essential for optimizing refractive predictability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the postoperative refractive error results obtained using Pentacam equivalent keratometry readings (EKR) versus IOLMaster 700 keratometry (K) values for IOL power calculation.
  • To evaluate the interchangeability of keratometry data from two different devices in standard IOL power calculation formulas.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study of 54 eyes from 31 cataract surgery patients.
  • Preoperative measurements using IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam.
  • Comparison of IOLMaster 700 K values (horizontal/vertical) and Pentacam EKR values (2, 3, and 4.5 mm zones).
  • Calculation of predictive refractive error (PRE) using Holladay-II, SRK/T, Haigis, and Hoffer-Q formulas with both measurement sets.
  • Analysis of absolute refractive error (ARE) to determine prediction accuracy.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in predicted refractive error (PRE) was found when using IOLMaster 700 K values versus Pentacam EKR 4.5 mm values across the tested formulas (p > 0.05).
  • No significant difference was observed between actual postoperative refractive error (APRE) and absolute refractive error (ARE) (p = 0.124).
  • The Holladay-II formula using IOLMaster 700 K values resulted in the closest refractive estimate, indicated by the lowest mean ARE (p = 0.271).

Conclusions:

  • Pentacam EKR 4.5 mm measurements and IOLMaster 700 K measurements are interchangeable for IOL power calculations.
  • The IOLMaster 700 K values, when utilized with the Holladay-II formula, provide the most predictive measurement for refractive outcomes.