Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 12, 2025

Synthesis of Single-Crystalline Core-Shell Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: February 10, 2023
Sulfur-Containing Analogues of the Reactive [CuOH]2+ Core
Wen Wu1, Jacqui Tehranchi De Hont2, Riffat Parveen3
1Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Hall, Campus Box 1134, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899, United States.
This study compares copper-sulfur (LCuSR) and copper-oxygen (LCuOH) complexes. Copper-sulfur complexes exhibit lower redox potentials and significantly slower proton-coupled electron transfer rates than their copper-oxygen counterparts.
Area of Science:
- Organometallic Chemistry
- Coordination Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
Background:
- The reactivity of copper-oxygen (LCuOH) complexes is well-established.
- Understanding the electronic and structural properties of related copper-sulfur (LCuSR) complexes is crucial for comparative analysis.
- Previous studies have suggested variations in electronic structure for different ligand types in copper complexes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To synthesize and characterize copper-sulfur complexes ([Bu4N][LCuSR], R = H, Ph) for comparison with LCuOH.
- To investigate the redox potentials and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactivity of LCuSR complexes.
- To elucidate the electronic structure of LCuZ complexes (Z = OH, SH, SPh, F, Cl, Br) using advanced computational methods.
Main Methods:
- Synthesis and characterization of [Bu4N][LCuSR] complexes via spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography.
- Electrochemical studies to determine redox potentials (LCuSR-/0 vs LCuOH-/0).
- Kinetic studies of PCET reactions at low temperatures (-80 °C).
- Density Functional Theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT calculations.
- Complete Active Space (CAS) self-consistent field and localized orbital CAS configuration interaction calculations.
Main Results:
- LCuSR complexes were successfully prepared and characterized.
- Redox potentials for LCuSR-/0 were approximately 50 mV lower than for LCuOH-/0, consistent with sulfur's lower electronegativity.
- PCET reaction rates for LCuSR were over 100 times slower than for LCuOH.
- Computational analyses revealed subtle structural and UV-visible differences between LCuOH, LCuSH, and LCuSPh.
- Calculations across a series of LCuZ complexes (Z = F, Cl, Br) support a consistent electronic structure.
Conclusions:
- Copper-sulfur complexes exhibit distinct electrochemical and reactivity profiles compared to copper-oxygen analogues.
- The electronic structure of the LCuZ series is consistent, challenging previous interpretations of ligand field effects.
- This work provides a unified understanding of electronic structures across various copper complexes with different chalcogenide and halide ligands.
Related Concept Videos
Preparation and Reactions of Sulfides
Structure and Nomenclature of Thiols and Sulfides
Preparation and Reactions of Thiols
Sulfur Assimilation
Diazonium Group Substitution with Halogens and Cyanide: Sandmeyer and Schiemann Reactions
Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution: Sulfonation of Benzene

![[DPEPhosbcpCu]PF6: A General and Broadly Applicable Copper-Based Photoredox Catalyst](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F59739.jpg&w=3840&q=50)