Prognosis of CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the Prediction of Clinical Outcomes

Charis G McNabney1, Stephanie L Sellers1, Ryan J A Wilson1

  • 1Department of Radiology (C.G.M., S.L.S., S.H., S.A.R., D.T.M., P.B., J.H., M.G.Z., J.A.L., J.R.W.M.), Centre for Heart Lung Innovation (S.L.S., J.W.L.Y., J.A.L.), and Department of Cardiology (A.A.A., A.A.T., J.A.L.), St Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6; Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (R.J.A.W.); Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark (B.L.N.); School of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.R.W.M.).

Insights

Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT (FFRCT) predicts clinical events. A positive FFRCT result without significant stenosis does not increase intermediate-term risk.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular imaging and intervention
  • Non-invasive cardiology
  • Diagnostic accuracy in cardiovascular disease

Background:

  • Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a key metric for assessing the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis.
  • Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is increasingly used for anatomical assessment.
  • FFR derived from CCTA (FFRCT) offers a non-invasive method to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of stenosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the prognostic value of FFRCT in routine clinical practice.
  • To determine if FFRCT can predict intermediate-term clinical outcomes.
  • To assess the independent predictive value of FFRCT and anatomical stenosis for adverse events.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 200 patients who underwent FFRCT between October 2015 and June 2017.
  • Patients categorized by significant stenosis (SS ≥ 50% diameter stenosis) and FFRCT positivity (FFRCT < 0.80).
  • Follow-up for vessel-oriented clinical events (VOCEs), including revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiac mortality.

Main Results:

  • At median follow-up of 477 days, 26 VOCE endpoints occurred in 22 patients.
  • Zero VOCE events in SS-negative and FFRCT-negative patients (n=58).
  • Higher VOCE rates in SS-positive/FFRCT-negative (10.1%) and SS-positive/FFRCT-positive (35.3%) groups.
  • Both FFRCT and SS were independent predictors of VOCE on multivariable Cox regression.

Conclusions:

  • FFRCT and anatomical stenosis are independent predictors of intermediate-term outcomes.
  • A positive FFRCT result in the absence of significant stenosis (>50%) is not associated with increased risk.
  • FFRCT provides valuable prognostic information in the assessment of coronary artery disease.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos