Inter- and Intraoperator Variability in Measurement of On-Site CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Structural

Kanako K Kumamaru1, Erin Angel1, Kelsey N Sommer1

  • 1Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan (K.K.K.); Canon Medical Systems USA, Tustin, Calif (E.A.); Department of Biomedical Engineering (K.N.S., C.N.I.), Department of Medicine (V.I., M.F.W., N.A., A.B., S.B.K., C.M., T.R., A.C.S., S.W., U.C.S.) and Department of Medicine (Cardiology) and Nuclear Medicine (S.M.), University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY; Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY (K.N.S., C.N.I.); Clinical and Translational Research Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY (V.I., M.F.W., N.A., A.B., S.B.K., C.M., T.R., A.C.S., S.W., U.C.S., C.N.I.); Buffalo General Medical Center, Buffalo, NY (S.K., K.P., M.M.S.); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan (S.F.); and Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (F.J.R.).

Summary

Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT FFR) measurements show good reproducibility among operators of varying expertise. On-site, face-to-face training for CT FFR may reduce variability compared to self-training.

Related Concept Videos