Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

False Memories01:18

False Memories

205
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
205
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.0K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

253.4K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
253.4K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.0K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.0K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

62.7K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
62.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

98.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
98.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Screening, sorting, and the feedback cycles that imperil peer review.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

AI, peer review and the human activity of science.

Nature·2025
Same author

The benefits and dangers of anthropomorphic conversational agents.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Rationalizing risk aversion in science: Why incentives to work hard clash with incentives to take risks.

PLoS biology·2024
Same author

Perceived experts are prevalent and influential within an antivaccine community on Twitter.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same journal

In This Issue.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Long-term cultural continuity across the Neanderthal-modern human sequence at Üçağızlı II Cave, northern Levant.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Dolphins use names to remember whom to avoid.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Retraction for Shaked and Frenkel, Curiouser and curiouser: Meningeal lymphoid structures in the aging brain.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Small but mighty: The outsized role of small water bodies in the global carbon cycle.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Functional traits produce conditional outcomes in different community contexts.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

17.0K

Misinformation in and about science.

Jevin D West1, Carl T Bergstrom2

  • 1Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 jevinw@uw.edu.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 10, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Misinformation disrupts collective knowledge building essential for societal progress. This study examines how scientific communication itself is vulnerable to misinformation, impacting critical global challenges.

Keywords:
data reasoningdisinformationfake newsmisinformationscience communication

More Related Videos

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.7K
Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems
06:18

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems

Published on: April 26, 2019

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 9, 2025

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

17.0K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.7K
Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems
06:18

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems

Published on: April 26, 2019

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Information Science
  • Communication Studies
  • Scientific Integrity

Background:

  • Human knowledge acquisition relies on collective information processing.
  • Misinformation poses a significant threat to societal functions like climate action, democratic processes, and public health.
  • Existing research primarily addresses misinformation in popular and social media.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the parallels between misinformation in popular media and the scientific enterprise.
  • To identify specific challenges within science communication that mirror broader misinformation issues.
  • To propose future research directions and interventions for scientific misinformation.

Main Methods:

  • This is a perspective piece, not an empirical study.
  • It involves a conceptual analysis and synthesis of existing issues in scientific communication.
  • Draws parallels between popular media misinformation tactics and scientific communication flaws.

Main Results:

  • The scientific community faces analogous problems to popular media, including hype, publication bias, citation manipulation, predatory publishing, and filter bubbles.
  • These issues within science can distort the information landscape, hindering progress on critical global issues.
  • The integrity of scientific information is compromised by internal and external misinformation pressures.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing misinformation within the scientific enterprise is crucial for maintaining public trust and enabling informed decision-making.
  • Interventions are needed to mitigate issues like publication bias and predatory publishing.
  • Further research should explore effective strategies to combat misinformation within scientific communication channels.