Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.5K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.5K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

107
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
107
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

37.6K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
37.6K
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

92
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
92
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

12.8K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
12.8K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.5K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Group-related network schema guides the learning of social networks.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Beyond evidence accumulation: shared-goal belief guides action generalization in social groups.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025
Same author

Group Typology Shapes Social Network Representations.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same author

The contribution of social interaction information on enhanced memory for mutually facing dyads.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

More evidence, greater generalization? The relation between the prevalence of observed action and the strength of generalization depends on action properties.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023
Same author

Event-related potential and behavioural evidence of goal-based expectations for consistent actions among group members.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2023
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.4K

Action Generalization Across Group Members: Action Efficiency Matters.

Jipeng Duan1,2,3, Yingdong Jiang1,2, Yunfeng He1,2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ningbo University.

Cognitive Science
|April 19, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People generalize inefficient actions within social groups, but not efficient ones. This spontaneous, implicit process suggests inefficient actions may be seen as culture-specific norms, influencing social learning.

Keywords:
Action generalizationEfficiencyGroup memberSocial group

More Related Videos

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.1K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.4K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.1K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Action Perception

Background:

  • Action generalization is common in social groups.
  • Action efficiency influences action understanding and social relevance.
  • The role of action efficiency in social generalization is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how action efficiency affects action generalization within social groups.
  • To determine if action generalization is spontaneous and implicit.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms of social action generalization.

Main Methods:

  • Computer animations simulated actions in social groups.
  • Actions were initiated by visual cues or category labels.
  • Response times measured identification of group-consistent vs. inconsistent actions.

Main Results:

  • Group members' inefficient actions were generalized, speeding up identification of consistent actions.
  • This effect was specific to social groups and absent for efficient actions.
  • Generalization occurred for actions by multiple members, not repeated actions by one, supporting group inference.

Conclusions:

  • Action efficiency bounds generalization within social groups.
  • This process is spontaneous and implicit, not requiring explicit generalization.
  • Inefficient actions may be generalized as culture-specific conventional forms.