Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Is Compliance With Guideline Recommended Follow-Up After Aortic Dissection Associated With Survival?
Amit Sharma1, Jesse M Manunga1, Larissa Stanberry1
1Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Insights
Adherence to aortic dissection follow-up guidelines is crucial. Patients with low compliance face double the lifetime risk of death after aortic dissection compared to those with high compliance.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Patients with acute aortic dissection (AD) require lifelong monitoring per ACC/AHA guidelines.
- Long-term outcomes associated with adherence to these follow-up recommendations are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of follow-up compliance on long-term mortality in patients surviving acute aortic dissection.
- To identify factors associated with adherence to recommended follow-up care.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 172 patients who survived hospital discharge for AD.
- Analysis of compliance with initial (3-month) and long-term follow-up appointments.
- Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.
Main Results:
- 71% attended the first follow-up; 52% attended >2/3 of recommended appointments.
- Noncompliance with long-term follow-up increased the risk of death by 50% (HR 1.6).
- Low compliance (<1/3 appointments) doubled the lifetime risk of death (HR 2.2) compared to high compliance (>2/3 appointments).
Conclusions:
- Nearly one-third of AD patients miss their first follow-up, predicting poor adherence.
- Low follow-up compliance significantly increases long-term mortality risk in acute aortic dissection survivors.
Background:
Patients with acute aortic dissection (AD) remain at risk for long-term complications and thus are recommended to adhere closely to American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association aorta guideline-based follow-up imaging and clinic visits. The long-term outcomes of compliance with such a model are not well understood.
Methods:
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients at a regional AD center who survived hospital discharge for AD and who were analyzed by compliance with initial follow-up at 3 months and long term after AD. The primary end point was death.
Results:
A total of 172 (66% type A; 33% type B) patients survived hospitalization and were followed up over 48 months (interquartile range [IQR], 21, 88 months). Of these patients, 122 (71%) attended the first follow-up appointment, and 90 (52%) attended more than two-thirds of recommended appointments. Patients who attended the first follow-up visit had improved long-term follow-up compliance (75% [IQR, 50%, 91%]) compared with patients who did not attend the first visit (18% [IQR, 0%, 57%]). Noncompliance with the scheduled long-term follow-up was associated with a 50% increase in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2, 2.1; P < .001). Furthermore, in patients with low compliance (consistently attending less than one-third of follow-up appointments), the lifetime risk of death after AD was more than double that of patients with high compliance (consistently attending more than two-thirds of appointments) (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5, 3.1; P < .001).
Conclusions:
Nearly one-third of patients with AD do not attend the first recommended follow-up visit, and such failure was associated with later noncompliance with subsequent follow-up. Low-compliant patients have double the lifetime risk of death after AD than do high-compliant patients.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management

