Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
[IMPLEMENTING AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING (ABPM) IN THE PRIMARY CLINIC]
Ivan Gur1, Adi Leiba2, Ariel Forer1
1Israeli Defense Force Medical Corps (IDFMC).
Insights
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in primary care significantly improves hypertension diagnosis accuracy compared to office blood pressure measurement (OBPM). Implementing ABPM in clinics is crucial for effective cardiovascular risk management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Preventive Medicine
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Hypertension (HTN) is a leading reversible risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality.
- Current screening via office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) lacks sensitivity and specificity.
- Home blood pressure monitoring has limitations in detecting harmful BP patterns and is not widely covered by insurers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical and distributional benefits of implementing 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in a primary care setting.
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ABPM compared to OBPM in identifying true hypertension.
- To determine the efficiency and utilization of ABPM in a primary care clinic.
Main Methods:
- Screening of 2167 service members at an Israeli Air Force airbase using OBPM.
- Inclusion criteria: BP > 130/85 or history of HTN; Exclusion criteria: antihypertensive medication, renal dysfunction, secondary HTN.
- Utilized borrowed ABPM monitors from the Israeli Defense Force's Medical Corps (IDFMC) without additional resources.
Main Results:
- 64 individuals met selection criteria; 56 underwent further OBPM.
- ABPM slots were utilized at 96.4% efficiency over 8 weeks, 2.19 times the regional average.
- Of 18 previously diagnosed with HTN, OBPM confirmed 13, but ABPM confirmed only 6 (46.1%).
- Positive predictive value of high OBPM for HTN diagnosis was 41.3%; Negative predictive value of normal OBPM was 80-83.4%.
Conclusions:
- Accurate diagnostic tools are essential for managing hypertension due to its therapeutic, prognostic, and economic implications.
- Affordable and user-friendly ABPM advancements, coupled with observed clinical benefits, highlight the need for its availability in primary care.
- Integrating ABPM into primary care settings can enhance hypertension diagnosis and management, improving patient outcomes.
Background:
Hypertension (HTN) is the leading reversible risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality. Screening is currently based on office blood pressure measurement (OBPM) - a method that is neither sensitive nor specific in detecting true HTN. Home blood pressure monitoring, which is often used to confirm and follow-up the diagnosis of HTN, is limited in its ability to detect certain blood pressure (BP) patterns that are harmful, and not covered by Israeli health insurers. Over the last two decades, the alternative and gold standard - 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has become cheap and easy to use, but it is virtually nonexistent in primary care clinics.
Methods:
This research aims to assess the clinical and distributional benefits of operating an ABPM in the primary clinic, without utilising any additional external resources besides the ABPM monitor, which was borrowed for this purpose from the regional Israeli Defense Force's Medical Corps (IDFMC) health-care center. All service-members in a medium sized Israeli Air Force (IAF) airbase were screened for HTN using OBPM. Inclusion criteria were BP over 130/85 at least once during the past two years or a personal or family history of HTN. Exclusion criteria were any antihypertensive medication taken over the past 6 months, renal dysfunction or secondary HTN.
Results:
A total of 2167 patients were screened, of whom 64 (2.9%) met selection criteria. Of these, 56 (87.5%) responded to our invitation and performed full OBPM on three separate occasions. During an 8 weeks long lease 46 of 47 (96.4%) available slots were utilized - 2.19 times more efficient than the regional clinic average utilization rate. Of 18 patients who have been diagnosed with HTN in the past, 13 (72.2%) met the criteria on OBPM but only 6 (46.1%) of these were confirmed as having HTN on ABPM. The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormally high BP on OBPM for the diagnosis of HTN on ABPM averaged 41.3%. The negative predictive value (NPV) of normal OBPM was 80% and 83.4%, for patients diagnosed in the past with HTN or having risk factors (obesity and family history), respectively.
Conclusions:
The therapeutic, prognostic and economic implications of the diagnosis of HTN necessitate the utilization of an accurate diagnostic tool. Recent advancements, making ABPM affordable and easy to use, combined with the immediate and dramatic clinical implications witnessed when ABPM was used in our clinic, necessitate a closer look at the need to make ABPM available at the primary clinic.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement

