Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

Treating Surfaces with a Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma using the COST-Jet
Published on: November 2, 2020
Direct and Indirect Bactericidal Effects of Cold Atmospheric-Pressure Microplasma and Plasma Jet
Ahmad Guji Yahaya1, Tomohiro Okuyama2, Jaroslav Kristof3
1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu 832-8561, Japan.
Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) microplasma effectively inactivates bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus and Cutibacterium acnes. Direct plasma treatment in air proved most effective, achieving significant bacterial reduction in just 3 minutes.
Area of Science:
- Plasma Physics
- Microbiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Bacterial infections pose significant health challenges.
- Developing novel antimicrobial strategies is crucial.
- Cold atmospheric-pressure plasmas offer a promising non-thermal inactivation method.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the bactericidal efficacy of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) cold atmospheric-pressure microplasma against Staphylococcus aureus and Cutibacterium acnes.
- To compare the effectiveness of direct microplasma treatment versus indirect treatment using plasma-activated water (PAW).
- To analyze the chemical changes in plasma-activated water.
Main Methods:
- Generation of microplasma using an AC power supply (0.9-2.4 kV, 27-30 kHz).
- Exposure of bacterial cultures (Staphylococcus aureus, Cutibacterium acnes) to direct microplasma and PAW.
- UV-Vis spectroscopy to analyze chemical species in PAW.
Main Results:
- Direct microplasma treatment demonstrated significant bactericidal effects, achieving a 2-log reduction in CFU/mL.
- Indirect treatment with PAW resulted in a 1-log reduction in CFU/mL.
- Increased treatment time in an argon-oxygen mixture led to decreased O2 concentration and reduced NO2-/NO3- levels in water.
Conclusions:
- DBD microplasma, particularly direct treatment in air, is a highly effective method for inactivating Staphylococcus aureus and Cutibacterium acnes.
- Plasma-activated water also exhibits bactericidal properties, though less potent than direct treatment.
- The study highlights the potential of cold atmospheric-pressure microplasma as a novel antimicrobial technology.
More Related Videos
10:03Investigating the Detrimental Effects of Low Pressure Plasma Sterilization on the Survival of Bacillus subtilis Spores Using Live Cell Microscopy
Published on: November 30, 2017
08:36An Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Setup to Investigate the Reactive Species Formation
Published on: November 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Temperature
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control
Biological Methods for Microbial Control
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...