Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025
Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Long-term outcomes after operative treatment for tibial pilon fractures
Quirine M J van der Vliet1, Yassine Ochen1, Michael F McTague2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School Orthopedic Trauma Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Objectives:
Aims of the present study were to establish generalizable outcome data on long-term functional outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after operative treatment of pilon fractures on a large scale. Second, it was aimed to examine factors associated with these outcomes.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study with follow-up by questionnaire.
Setting:
Two level 1 trauma centers.
Patients:
Two hundred twenty-five of 480 eligible patients completed the survey (response rate 47%).
Intervention:
Open reduction internal fixation for tibial pilon fracture.
Main Outcome Measurements:
Ankle function measured using the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, physical function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System Physical Function (PROMIS PF, Short Form 10a) questionnaire and HRQoL using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire.
Results:
At a medium follow-up of 82 months (82 (interquartile range (IQR), 45-120), median Foot and Ankle Ability Measure was 74 (IQR, 57-82), median PROMIS PF 49 (IQR, 44-57), median EQ-5D-3L 0.81 (IQR, 0.71-0.84). HRQoL was significantly lower compared to a reference population (P < .001). In multivariable regression analyses, smoking was associated with poorer HRQoL. Higher body mass index, deep infection, and lower HRQoL were associated with worse ankle function.
Conclusions:
Long-term patient-reported outcomes after operative treatment of pilon fractures reveal impaired functionality and lower HRQoL compared to an uninjured reference population. As pilon fractures can have significant effects on a patient's life, patients should be counseled about the expected long-term outcomes to set realistic expectations. This study emphasizes the importance of obtaining both general and region-specific measures when evaluating outcomes after injury, in order to evaluate the injury of interest in the accurate context.
Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic level III.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
07:35Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012
