Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 7, 2025

In Vitro Thrombosis Test for Ventricular Assist Devices
Published on: March 21, 2025
Dialyzer Performance During Hemodialysis Without Systemic Anticoagulation Using a Heparin-Grafted Dialyzer Combined
Karlien François1, Dieter De Clerck1, Annelies Tonnelier1
1Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Rationale & Objective:
The EvoCit study was designed to evaluate performance of a heparin-grafted dialyzer during hemodialysis with and without systemic anticoagulation.
Study Design:
Randomized, crossover, noninferiority trial. Noninferiority was defined as a difference of≤10% for the primary outcome.
Setting & Participants:
Single hemodialysis center; 26 prevalent patients treated with 617 hemodialysis sessions.
Interventions:
Hemodialysis using a heparin-grafted dialyzer combined with a 1.0mmol/L citrate-enriched dialysate ("EvoCit") without systemic anticoagulation compared with hemodialysis performed with a heparin-grafted dialyzer with systemic heparin ("EvoHep"). Patients were randomly allocated to a first period of 4 weeks and crossed over to the alternative strategy for a second period of 4 weeks.
Outcomes:
The primary end point was the difference in Kt/Vurea between EvoCit and EvoHep. Secondary end points were urea reduction ratio, middle molecule removal, treatment time, thrombin generation, and reduction in dialyzer blood compartment volume.
Results:
The estimated difference in Kt/Vurea between EvoCit and EvoHep was-0.03 (95% CI, -0.06 to-0.007), establishing noninferiority with mean Kt/Vurea of 1.47±0.05 (SE) for EvoCit and 1.50±0.05 for EvoHep. Noninferiority was also established for reduction ratios of urea and β2-microglobulin. Premature discontinuation of dialysis was required for 4.2% of sessions among 6 patients during EvoCit and no sessions during EvoHep. Effective treatment time was 236±5 minutes for EvoCit and 238±1 minutes for EvoHep. Thrombin generation was increased and there was greater reduction in dialyzer blood compartment volume after treatments with EvoCit compared with EvoHep.
Limitations:
The effects of avoiding systemic anticoagulation on clinical outcomes were not evaluated.
Conclusions:
EvoCit is noninferior to EvoHep with respect to solute clearance but results in a greater number of shortened treatments, more membrane clotting, and greater thrombin generation TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03887468.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Dialysis
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...

