Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

11:11
Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots
Published on: February 11, 2022
4.7K
Performance of Unobserved Self-Collected Nasal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Utilizing a Remote
Ron M Kagan1, Amy A Rogers1, Gwynngelle A Borillo1
1Quest Diagnostics Infectious Disease, San Juan Capistrano, California, USA.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
|May 6, 2021
Summary
Unobserved self-collection of nasal swabs is effective for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, reducing PPE use and exposure risk. Pooled testing with this method shows a very low likelihood of false-negative results.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Public Health
Background:
- Remote specimen collection for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) RT-PCR reduces personal protective equipment (PPE) use and exposure risk.
- Unobserved self-collection kits enable remote testing strategies.
- Assessing self-collection's impact on test performance is crucial for widespread screening programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing using self-collected anterior nasal swabs.
- To determine the impact of unobserved specimen self-collection on test accuracy.
- To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of pooled testing strategies in a self-collection cohort.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Quest Diagnostics SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR for self-collected anterior nasal swabs from an employee return-to-work program.
- Tabulated cycle threshold (Ct) values for N-gene targets (N1, N3) and human RNase P (RP) control.
- Compared Ct values with a cohort of health care provider-collected specimens.
Main Results:
- 1.8% positivity rate among 47,923 participants.
- Minimal failure rate (0.011%) for the RP control gene.
- Median Ct values for self-collected specimens were higher than for symptomatic patients, but comparable to asymptomatic patients.
- Pooled testing (4 specimens) showed a 5.2% inconclusive rate but only one false-negative result.
Conclusions:
- Unobserved self-collection of nasal swabs provides adequate sampling for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.
- Concerns regarding increased false negatives with self-collection are alleviated.
- Specimen pooling is a viable strategy for self-collected samples, with a low false-negative risk using sensitive, dual-target assays.

