Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments
Published on: March 18, 2019
Structuralism and the conformity of mathematics and nature
1Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Abstract:
Structuralists typically appeal to some variant of the widely popular 'mapping' account of mathematical representation to suggest that mathematics is applied in modern science to represent the world's physical structure. However, in this paper, I argue that this realist interpretation of the 'mapping' account presupposes that physical systems possess an 'assumed structure' that is at odds with modern physical theory. Through two detailed case studies concerning the use of the differential and variational calculus in modern dynamics, I show that the formal structure that we need to assume in order to apply the mapping account is inconsistent with the way in which mathematics is applied in modern physics. The problem is that a realist interpretation of the 'mapping' account imposes too severe of a constraint on the conformity that must exist between mathematics and nature in order for mathematics to represent the structure of a physical system.
Related Concept Videos
Structuralism
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
Conformity
Natural and Artificial Concepts
Mason's Rule
Loop gain is determined by identifying and tracing a path from a node back to itself. This involves computing the product of branch gains along the loop. Each loop's gain is crucial for further...
Symmetry
Functionalism
James envisioned psychology's...

