Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2025

09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
9.2K
Why do we need the uncertainty factor?
Summary
A novel uncertainty factor method improves expressing large measurement uncertainty. This approach is useful for analytical methods and sampling heterogeneous materials, offering a new way to calculate confidence limits.
Area of Science:
- Measurement science and analytical chemistry.
Background:
- Traditional methods for expressing measurement uncertainty can be inadequate when uncertainty is large (e.g., >20% expanded relative uncertainty).
- This limitation is particularly evident in certain analytical methods and during the primary sampling of highly heterogeneous materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and describe a new method for expressing measurement uncertainty, termed the 'uncertainty factor'.
- To highlight the applicability of the uncertainty factor in scenarios with large uncertainties and complex sampling.
Main Methods:
- The uncertainty factor is calculated based on the measurement result and its associated uncertainty.
- Confidence limits are determined by multiplying and dividing the measurement result by the uncertainty factor.
Main Results:
- The uncertainty factor provides a distinct approach to defining uncertainty intervals compared to traditional additive/subtractive methods.
- This method is particularly effective for large uncertainties where traditional methods may be less intuitive or accurate.
Conclusions:
- The uncertainty factor offers a valuable alternative for expressing measurement uncertainty, especially in challenging analytical and sampling contexts.
- This new factor simplifies the calculation of confidence limits when dealing with significant measurement variability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty: Overview
1.2K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
1.4K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.4K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
7.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
7.9K
The Uncertainty Principle
29.5K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
29.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.1K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.1K
Significant Figures in Calculations
15.5K
Uncertainty in measurements can be avoided by reporting the results of a calculation with the correct number of significant figures. This can be determined by the following rules for rounding numbers:
15.5K

