Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Designing Human-Centered Journeys: Design Strategies for Enhancing Wayfinding in Complex Healthcare Environments.

HERD·2026
Same author

Mobile Brain-Body Imaging and Visual Data of Theatrical Actors During Rehearsal and Performance.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Assessing the Feasibility and Efficacy of Virtual Reality Navigational Training for Older Adults.

Innovation in aging·2025
Same author

Electrokinetic convection-enhanced delivery for infusion into the brain from a hydrogel reservoir.

Communications biology·2024
Same author

Wearable Biosensor Technology in Education: A Systematic Review.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Clinical outcomes of peripheral nerve interfaces for rehabilitation in paralysis and amputation: a literature review.

Journal of neural engineering·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures
07:09

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures

Published on: August 29, 2018

12.9K

Comparing physiological responses during cognitive tests in virtual environments vs. in identical real-world

Saleh Kalantari1, James D Rounds2, Julia Kan2

  • 1Department of Design and Environmental Analysis, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA. sk3268@cornell.edu.

Scientific Reports
|May 14, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Virtual environments (VEs) closely mimic real-world settings for design testing. Cognitive performance and physiological responses showed high consistency between real and virtual classrooms, validating VEs for research.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.3K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures
07:09

Virtual Reality Experiments with Physiological Measures

Published on: August 29, 2018

12.9K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.3K
A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Cognitive science
  • Virtual reality research

Background:

  • Virtual environments (VEs) offer controlled settings for design evaluation.
  • Generalizability of human responses from VEs to real-world contexts is crucial but under-researched.
  • Limited studies compare identical real and virtual environments for response consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the consistency of human responses between identical real-world and virtual reality (VR) environments.
  • To compare cognitive performance and physiological data in real versus virtual classroom settings.
  • To assess the validity of VEs for design testing and human response measurement.

Main Methods:

  • A real-world classroom was precisely replicated in a virtual environment using rendering tools.
  • Participants completed cognitive tests in both the real and virtual classrooms.
  • Physiological data, including EEG, ECG, EOG, GSR, and head acceleration, were collected.

Main Results:

  • Cognitive test accuracy was similar, but response speed was faster in the VE.
  • No significant differences in eye blink rate or heart rate were observed.
  • Head acceleration and galvanic skin response (GSR) variance were lower in the VE.
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) frequency band-power and event-related potentials showed strong similarity, with one exception in executive functioning.

Conclusions:

  • VEs can provide comparable cognitive and physiological response data to real-world settings.
  • The study supports the generalizability of human responses measured in VEs for design evaluation.
  • VEs demonstrate potential as a valid tool for research, though subtle differences in executive functioning warrant further investigation.