Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2025

Capturing Flow-weighted Water and Suspended Particulates from Agricultural Canals During Drainage Events
Published on: November 7, 2017
Dynamic stormwater management to mitigate phosphorous export
Sadia Tamanna Khan1, R Edward Beighley2, David VanHoven3
1Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
Abstract:
Altered stormwater flow characteristics and associated changes in nutrient and sediment fluxes due to urbanization threaten the water quality of many water bodies. For example, particle-bound phosphorus in stormwater runoff adds to the nutrient pool that can produce harmful algal blooms, and the associated particulate material can endanger fish and other living organisms in surface waters by increasing turbidity. While many studies have investigated how Total Solids (TS) particle size distributions vary in urban stormwater and the associated design criteria for Best Management Practices (BMPs) to remove TS, few studies have included different forms of phosphorus and their association with particle sizes to characterize design criteria to specifically maximize Total Phosphorus (TP) removal. This highlights a gap in our understanding of how the particle size distributions of TP and TS are related, and how these particle size distributions vary within and between storm events. Bridging this knowledge gap can improve design methods for BMPs specifically targeting phosphorus removal. This study characterizes within event (i.e., hourly) TP and TS particle size distributions and associated fluxes from urban catchments in the City of Cambridge, Massachusetts, to characterize potential TP and TS removal based on four different diversion and treatment strategies. The stormwater diversion strategies integrate new insights on temporal variations in particle size distributions and mass loading characteristics. In terms of diverted stormwater, the volume of stormwater treated tends to control more than what water is treated (e.g., first flush, event high flows, or smaller event flows). Based on the event data obtained in this study, considering flow volume different diversion approaches are optimal for TP vs TS, but treatment combined with particles sizes < 100 μm is best for both TP and TS.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
The Phosphorus Cycle
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Factors Affecting Solubility
Bioremediation

