Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Processing of Bulk Nanocrystalline Metals at the US Army Research Laboratory
Published on: March 7, 2018
Scanning Electron Microscopy versus Transmission Electron Microscopy for Material Characterization: A Comparative
Nicolas Brodusch1, Salim V Brahimi2, Evelin Barbosa De Melo2
1McGill Electron Microscopy Research Group, Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 0C5.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) now matches transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for characterizing quenched and tempered steel microstructures. This cost-effective SEM approach provides high-resolution imaging and quantitative analysis of nanoscale features.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science and Engineering
- Metallurgy
- Microscopy and Imaging Techniques
Background:
- Traditional microstructure characterization of quenched and tempered steels relies on Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) due to its high resolution.
- Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) offers advantages in cost, availability, and area coverage, with significant advancements in resolution.
- A need exists for cost-effective, high-statistical significance characterization methods in materials science.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the microstructure characterization capabilities of TEM and SEM electron channeling contrast techniques in high-strength steels.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of SEM, complemented by electron backscatter diffraction and deep learning, for quantitative microstructure analysis.
- To demonstrate a lower-cost, higher-statistical significance alternative for materials characterization.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of quenched and tempered high-strength steel microstructures using TEM and SEM electron channeling contrast.
- Utilized electron backscatter diffraction for martensite size distribution and retained austenite fraction assessment.
- Employed SEM secondary imaging and a deep learning method for quantitative characterization of carbide precipitation (size, shape, distribution).
Main Results:
- Both TEM and SEM provided similar conclusions regarding the distribution of martensite laths/plates and nanoscale features like nanotwins and dislocations.
- Quantitative measurements of carbide precipitation down to nanometer scale using SEM and deep learning showed good agreement with TEM-based results.
- Electron backscatter diffraction effectively assessed martensite size and retained austenite fraction.
Conclusions:
- SEM electron channeling contrast techniques are a viable and effective alternative to TEM for characterizing quenched and tempered steel microstructures.
- The integration of SEM with electron backscatter diffraction and deep learning enables cost-effective, statistically significant quantitative analysis of nanoscale features.
- This study encourages the adoption of advanced SEM-based methods to reduce characterization costs and improve statistical significance in materials science.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
Overview of Electron Microscopy
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...
Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy

