Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Understanding the importance of peak bone mass.

Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America·2025

Same author

Pediatric Scaphoid Nonunions: Does Insurance Status Play a Role?

Journal of pediatric orthopedics·2025

Same author

Volar Distal Radius Buckle Fractures: Is Bracing and Home Management Safe?

Pediatric emergency care·2024

Same author

Management of Acute Wounds-Expert Panel Consensus Statement.

Advances in wound care·2024

Same author

Reducing Rigid Immobilization for Toddler's Fractures: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Pediatric quality & safety·2024

Same author

How Much Bullying and Discrimination Are Reported by Sexual and Gender Minorities in Orthopaedics?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2024

Same journal

Implementing the SSKIN Bundle in Home Healthcare: A Tool Tutorial for Reducing Pressure Injuries.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026

Same journal

How Collaboration Between Surgeons and Medical Oncologists Affects Outcomes for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026

Same journal

Uneven Compassion and the Emotional Safety of the Healthcare Workforce.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026

Same journal

Development and Implementation of a Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Surgical Case Duration.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026

Same journal

Decreasing Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Testing Turnaround Time for Infants in a Hospital Setting: A Continuous Quality Improvement Project.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026

Same journal

Symptom Tracking in Primary Care: Designing and Testing an EHR-Embedded Safety-Net System.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Published on: December 15, 2023

Reducing Surgical Specimen Errors Through Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement.

Jessica B Holstine, Julie Balch Samora

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

|May 28, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A quality improvement initiative significantly reduced surgical specimen errors from 10 to 2.31 per 1,000 specimens. These changes in labeling and communication aim to prevent patient harm and improve diagnostic accuracy.

More Related Videos

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication

Published on: December 15, 2023

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

Area of Science:

Healthcare Quality Improvement
Surgical Pathology
Patient Safety

Background:

Over 34,000 surgical cases and 10,000 surgical specimens are processed annually.
An average of 10 errors per 1,000 surgical specimens were identified.
Preventable harm from specimen errors can lead to treatment delays, incorrect therapy, or missed diagnoses.

Purpose of the Study:

To decrease surgical specimen errors from 10 per 1,000 to zero errors per month.
To enhance patient safety by minimizing risks associated with specimen handling.

Main Methods:

Utilized the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement methodology.
Identified root causes and key drivers of specimen errors.
Implemented interventions including improved labeling, standardized time-out and reconciliation, and a Specimen Request Form for enhanced communication.

Main Results:

Over 46 months, 234 errors were found in 33,962 specimens, reducing the error rate to 2.31 per 1,000.
Mean order errors decreased from 3.66 to 0.13 per month.
Mean labeling-related errors decreased from 1.5 to 0.5 per month.

Conclusions:

A multidisciplinary team successfully reduced surgical specimen errors through improved requesting and intraoperative handling.
Implemented changes demonstrated a significant reduction in errors, mitigating potential patient harm.
This study highlights the effectiveness of systematic QI interventions in improving surgical specimen accuracy.