Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

06:51
Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
Published on: May 30, 2019
7.7K
Can transfer type and implant angulation affect impression accuracy? A 3D in vitro evaluation.
Davide Farronato1, Pietro Mario Pasini1, Veronica Campana2
1Department of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Odontology
|June 2, 2021
Summary
Impression accuracy for dental implants depends on coping type and implant angle. Both factors significantly impact passive fit, crucial for successful superstructure restoration.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Prosthodontics
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Passive fit of dental prostheses is essential for long-term success.
- Impression accuracy directly influences the passive fit of implant-supported superstructures.
- Understanding factors affecting impression accuracy is critical for predictable clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of different impression coping types on accuracy.
- To assess the influence of varying implant angles on impression accuracy.
- To determine the combined effect of coping type and implant divergence on impression accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Three impression coping types were tested: closed tray (CT), open tray (COT), and telescopic open tray (TOT).
- Impressions were made on a master model with implants at 0°, 15°, and 35°.
- Digital models were created, and linear/angular discrepancies were measured and analyzed using ANOVA.
Main Results:
- Significant discrepancies in linear (Δx, Δy, Δz) and angular measurements were observed.
- Both impression coping type and implant divergence angle significantly affected impression accuracy (p ≤ 0.001).
- Specific coping types and greater implant angulations led to reduced accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Coping type is a significant parameter influencing dental impression accuracy.
- Implant divergence angle is a significant parameter influencing dental impression accuracy.
- Clinical choices of impression techniques and consideration of implant angulation are critical for achieving passive fit.

