Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
A meta-analysis of the comparison of phlebitis between midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
Huapeng Lu1, Qinling Yang1, Boyan Tian1
1Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Aims:
To compare the risk of phlebitis between midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in infusion therapy with a meta-analysis.
Design:
This was a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Data Sources:
Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, ProQuest, CNKI, WanFang, VIP and SinoMed were searched from inception to May 2020.
Review Methods:
All studies comparing the risk of phlebitis between midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters were included. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two authors independently assessed the literature and extracted the data. Meta-analyses were conducted to generate estimates of phlebitis risk in patients with midline catheters verse peripherally inserted central catheters, and publication bias was evaluated with RevMan 5.3.
Results:
A total of seven studies were collected, involving 1377 participants. The incidence of phlebitis with midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters was 1.52% and 3.41%. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of phlebitis has no significant difference between midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters. The sensitivity analysis shows that the results from this meta-analysis are fair in overall studies. All studies have no significant publication bias.
Conclusion:
This study provides the first systematic assessment of the risk of phlebitis between midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters. The incidence of phlebitis has no significant difference between them. There are many factors to consider when choosing vascular access devices.
Insights
Midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters show no significant difference in phlebitis risk. This meta-analysis of seven studies found similar phlebitis incidence, aiding vascular access device selection.
Area of Science:
- Medical Devices
- Vascular Access
- Infection Control
Background:
- Phlebitis is a common complication of vascular access devices.
- Midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters are frequently used for infusion therapy.
- Comparing the risk of phlebitis between these devices is crucial for patient safety and optimal device selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a meta-analysis comparing the risk of phlebitis between midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters.
- To systematically assess the available evidence on phlebitis incidence associated with these two types of vascular access devices.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
- Searched multiple databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, etc.) from inception to May 2020.
- Included seven studies with 1377 participants; assessed publication bias using RevMan 5.3.
Main Results:
- The incidence of phlebitis was 1.52% for midline catheters and 3.41% for peripherally inserted central catheters.
- Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in phlebitis risk between the two device types.
- Sensitivity analysis indicated fair overall study results, with no significant publication bias detected.
Conclusions:
- This meta-analysis indicates that midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters have comparable risks of phlebitis.
- The findings suggest that factors beyond phlebitis risk should be considered when choosing between these vascular access devices.
- This study offers the first systematic assessment comparing phlebitis risk between midline and peripherally inserted central catheters.
Related Concept Videos
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

