Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses Version 2019: Comparison With Version 2005 for Class Distribution,...

BACKGROUND. The Bosniak classification system for cystic renal masses (CRMs) was updated in 2019, requiring further investigation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare versions 2005 and 2019 of the Bosniak classification system in terms of class distribution, diagnostic performance, interreader agreement, and intermodality agreement between CT and MRI. METHODS. This retrospective study included 100 patients (mean age, 52.4 ± 11.6 years; 68 men, 32 women) with 104 CRMs (74 malignant) who underwent CT, MRI, and resection between 2010 and 2019. Two radiologists independently evaluated CRMs in separate sessions for each combination of version and modality and assigned a Bosniak class. Diagnostic performance was compared using McNemar tests. Interreader and intermodality agreement were analyzed using weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS. Across readers and modalities, the proportion of class IIF CRMs was higher for version 2019 than version 2005 (reader 1: 28.8-30.8% vs 6.7-12.5%; reader 2: 26.0-28.8% vs 8.7-19.2%), although 95% CIs overlapped for reader 2 on CT. The proportion of class III CRMs was lower for version 2019 than version 2005 (reader 1: 33.7-35.6% vs 49.0-51.9%; reader 2: 31.7-40.4% vs 37.5-52.9%), although 95% CIs overlapped for all comparisons. Version 2019 showed lower sensitivity for malignancy than version 2005 across readers and modalities (all p < .05); for example, using CT, sensitivity was 75.7% for both readers with version 2019 versus 85.1-87.8% with version 2005. However, version 2019 showed higher specificity than version 2005, which was significant (all p < .05) for reader 1. For example, using CT, specificity was 73.3% (reader 1) and 70.0% (reader 2) with version 2019 versus 50.0% (reader 1) and 56.7% (reader 2) with version 2005. Diagnostic accuracy was not different between versions (version 2005: 76.9-85.6%; version 2019: 74.0-78.8%). Interreader and intermodality agreement were substantial for version 2005 (κ = 0.676-0.782 and 0.711-0.723, respectively) and version 2019 (κ = 0.756-0.804 and 0.704-0.781, respectively). CONCLUSION. Use of version 2019 versus version 2005 of the Bosniak classification system results in a shift in CRM assignment from class III to class IIF. Version 2019 results in lower sensitivity, higher specificity, and similar accuracy versus version 2005. Interreader and intermodality agreement are similar between versions. CLINICAL IMPACT. Version 2019 facilitates recommending imaging surveillance for more CRMs.