Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2025

Optical Mapping of Intra-Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ and Transmembrane Potential in the Langendorff-perfused Rabbit Heart
Published on: September 10, 2015
Measuring myocardial blood flow with 82rubidium using Gjedde-Patlak-Rutland graphical analysis
Sima Gregg1, Georgia Keramida1, A Michael Peters2
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gjedde-Patlak-Rutland (GPR) graphical analysis provides a simpler, valid method for measuring myocardial blood flow (MBF) using 82Rb PET imaging. This technique shows promise for clinical application and development into polar map displays.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear cardiology
- Radiopharmaceutical imaging
- Quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging
Background:
- Myocardial blood flow (MBF) is crucial for assessing cardiac health.
- Current MBF measurement using 82Rb involves complex non-linear modeling.
- Simpler, validated methods are needed for routine clinical use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of Gjedde-Patlak-Rutland (GPR) graphical analysis as a simplified method for MBF quantification.
- To compare GPR-derived MBF with established modeling techniques using 82Rb PET.
- To assess the clinical applicability of GPR analysis for myocardial perfusion imaging.
Main Methods:
- Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed using 82Rb PET with adenosine or regadenoson stress.
- Blood 82Rb clearance into myocytes (K1) was calculated using the modified Crone-Renkin equation.
- GPR analysis was applied to measure 82Rb clearance into myocardium (Z) between 1-3 minutes post-injection.
- Myocardial extracellular fluid volume (ECV) was calculated as 1 - [Z/K1].
- A modified Lortie equation was used to calculate MBF from Z (MBFZ).
Main Results:
- Both adenosine and regadenoson equally increased MBF.
- Resting ECV was ~35 ml/100 ml, increasing to ~40 ml/100 ml post-stress.
- The ratio Z/K1 averaged 0.62, leading to BZ = 39 ml/min/100 ml.
- MBFZ derived from GPR analysis correlated well with MBF from standard modeling (y = 0.43x + 22; r = 0.84).
- Stress/rest ratios also showed moderate correlation (r = 0.64).
Conclusions:
- GPR analysis is a promising, analytically simpler technique for measuring MBF with 82Rb PET.
- The method yields MBF in units of ml/min/ml total tissue volume.
- Further development, including polar map display, is warranted for clinical implementation.
More Related Videos
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
11:09High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022