Do We Become More Cautious for Others When Large Amounts of Money Are at Stake?

Eleonore Batteux1, Eamonn Ferguson2, Richard J Tunney3

  • 1Centre for the Study of Decision-Making Uncertainty, University College London, UK.

Insights

People do not show increased caution for others in large financial decisions. Risk-taking increases for large gains, unlike in medical decisions, highlighting concerns about financial agents' excessive risk appetite.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Decision Science
  • Neuroeconomics

Background:

  • Financial decisions are often made by agents for others.
  • A discrepancy exists between cautious medical decisions for others and less cautious financial decisions.
  • Limited research addresses large financial stakes, hindering direct comparison to medical domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of outcome magnitude on financial risk-taking when individuals make decisions for others.
  • To compare financial decision-making under risk with medical decision-making contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted involving participants choosing between safe and risky financial options.
  • The effect of outcome magnitude (large vs. small amounts) on risk-taking was analyzed.
  • Self-other decision-making differences were examined across gain and loss domains.

Main Results:

  • Decision-makers did not exhibit greater caution when deciding for others with large financial amounts.
  • Risk-taking significantly increased in the gain domain for large outcomes.
  • No significant self-other differences in risk-taking were observed in the loss domain for either outcome magnitude.

Conclusions:

  • The caution observed in medical decisions for others does not directly translate to financial decisions involving large sums.
  • Increased risk-taking in the financial gain domain with large amounts warrants attention.
  • Findings suggest potential for excessive risk-taking by financial agents, echoing prior concerns.

Related Concept Videos

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
42.0K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.5K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
41.3K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
212
Aggression01:47

Aggression

Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
28.9K