Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Do We Become More Cautious for Others When Large Amounts of Money Are at Stake?
Eleonore Batteux1, Eamonn Ferguson2, Richard J Tunney3
1Centre for the Study of Decision-Making Uncertainty, University College London, UK.
Insights
People do not show increased caution for others in large financial decisions. Risk-taking increases for large gains, unlike in medical decisions, highlighting concerns about financial agents' excessive risk appetite.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Science
- Neuroeconomics
Background:
- Financial decisions are often made by agents for others.
- A discrepancy exists between cautious medical decisions for others and less cautious financial decisions.
- Limited research addresses large financial stakes, hindering direct comparison to medical domains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of outcome magnitude on financial risk-taking when individuals make decisions for others.
- To compare financial decision-making under risk with medical decision-making contexts.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted involving participants choosing between safe and risky financial options.
- The effect of outcome magnitude (large vs. small amounts) on risk-taking was analyzed.
- Self-other decision-making differences were examined across gain and loss domains.
Main Results:
- Decision-makers did not exhibit greater caution when deciding for others with large financial amounts.
- Risk-taking significantly increased in the gain domain for large outcomes.
- No significant self-other differences in risk-taking were observed in the loss domain for either outcome magnitude.
Conclusions:
- The caution observed in medical decisions for others does not directly translate to financial decisions involving large sums.
- Increased risk-taking in the financial gain domain with large amounts warrants attention.
- Findings suggest potential for excessive risk-taking by financial agents, echoing prior concerns.
Abstract:
A considerable proportion of financial decisions are made by agents acting on behalf of other people. Although people are more cautious for others when making medical decisions, this does not seem to be the case for economic decisions. However, studies with large amounts of money are particularly absent from the literature, which precludes a clear comparison to studies in the medical domain. To address this gap, we investigated the effect of outcome magnitude in two experiments where participants made choices between safe and risky options. Decision-makers were not more cautious for others over large amounts. In fact, risk-taking was accentuated for large amounts in the gain domain. We did not find self-other differences in the loss domain for either outcome magnitude. This suggests that the caution observed in medical decisions does not replicate in financial decisions with large amounts, or at least not in the same way. These results echo the concerns that have been raised about excessive risk-taking by financial agents.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Reason and Intuition
Persuasion Strategies
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Aggression

