Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting01:26

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

1.4K
Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
1.4K
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.8K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.8K
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

1.2K
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deriving a Korean SF-6Dv2 Value Set Using a Discrete Choice Experiment with Duration.

PharmacoEconomics·2026
Same author

Development of the Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes Impact Measure (P-TIM).

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2026
Same author

Impacts of future sea level change on Greenland from community knowledge, coastal mapping, and glacial isostatic adjustment models.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Development and Content Validity Evaluation of the Condition-Agnostic Treatment Goal Evaluation Scale (TGES) for Use in Chronic Conditions.

Patient related outcome measures·2026
Same author

Health Utilities Associated with Pneumococcal Diseases in Children and Adults: A Targeted Literature Review and Meta-analysis.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2026
Same author

A United Kingdom Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Development and Validation of a Brief Healthcare Insecurity Scale in a Sample of U.S. Adults Living with and without HIV.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

A Competency Framework for Health Technology Assessment Expertise: Results from a Delphi Study.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Physician-led Switching from Reference Biologics to Biosimilars: What is the Effect on selected Health-Related Outcomes and Costs for IBD Patients in Germany?

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Critical Comments by the European Medicines Agency on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Regulatory Submissions (2020-2023).

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Interpreting the Economic Value of TPEx in Recurrent or Metastatic HNSCC: The Importance of Decision Context, Utility Timing, and Treatment Burden.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Development, use and psychometric properties of vision and hearing bolt-ons for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans
12:32

Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.6K

Vignette-Based Utilities: Usefulness, Limitations, and Methodological Recommendations.

Louis S Matza1, Katie D Stewart1, Andrew J Lloyd2

  • 1Evidera, Patient-Centered Research Group, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
|June 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Vignette-based methods are crucial for estimating health utilities when standard approaches fail in cost-utility analyses (CUAs). This article offers guidance on using these methods effectively for healthcare decision-making.

Keywords:
cost-utility analysishealth state utilitieshealth state vignettestime trade-offutility assessmentvignette-based methods

More Related Videos

Facilitating the Analysis of Immunological Data with Visual Analytic Techniques
10:58

Facilitating the Analysis of Immunological Data with Visual Analytic Techniques

Published on: January 2, 2011

10.3K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans
12:32

Image Rendering Techniques in Postmortem Computed Tomography: Evaluation of Biological Health and Profile in Stranded Cetaceans

Published on: September 27, 2020

9.6K
Facilitating the Analysis of Immunological Data with Visual Analytic Techniques
10:58

Facilitating the Analysis of Immunological Data with Visual Analytic Techniques

Published on: January 2, 2011

10.3K
Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

12.0K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Standardized methods for utility estimation in cost-utility analyses (CUAs) are preferred by health technology assessment agencies.
  • Generic preference-based measures are commonly used in clinical trials for utility derivation.
  • No standardized approach is always feasible or appropriate for specific medical conditions or treatments in CUAs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide comprehensive recommendations on the use of vignette-based methods for utility estimation in CUAs.
  • To guide researchers, reviewers, and policymakers in designing, conducting, and evaluating studies using vignette-based utilities.
  • To address the lack of published guidance on vignette methodology in health economics.

Main Methods:

  • The article reviews and synthesizes existing practices and expert opinion on vignette-based utility estimation.
  • Recommendations are structured around key aspects: when to use, vignette development, valuation, application in models, and limitations.
  • The methodology focuses on practical guidance for real-world application in economic evaluations.

Main Results:

  • Vignette-based methods are essential when no standardized approach can represent specific health states for CUAs.
  • The article outlines best practices for developing and valuing health state descriptions (vignettes).
  • Guidance is provided on integrating vignette-based utilities into economic models and understanding their limitations.

Conclusions:

  • Vignette-based methods are a valuable, sometimes necessary, tool for utility estimation in economic evaluations.
  • Adherence to recommended practices can enhance the quality and reliability of vignette-based utilities.
  • This guidance aims to improve the transparency and rigor of CUAs employing vignette methodologies for healthcare decision-making.