Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Serum Concentrations of a Long-acting Cat Formulation of Transdermal Buprenorphine in C57BL/6 Mice.

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS·2023
Same author

Mechanical strain induces ex vivo expansion of periosteum.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Comparison of Floor Cleaning and Disinfection Processes in a Research Animal Facility.

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS·2022
Same author

An Optimized Zebrafish Nursery Feeding Regimen Improves Growth Rates and Labor Costs.

Zebrafish·2021
Same author

Reuse of Disposable Isolation Gowns in Rodent Facilities during a Pandemic.

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS·2021
Same author

Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Infection Compromises Wound Healing by Causing Deficiencies in Granulation Tissue Collagen.

Annals of surgery·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Morris Water Maze Test: Optimization for Mouse Strain and Testing Environment
10:24

Morris Water Maze Test: Optimization for Mouse Strain and Testing Environment

Published on: June 22, 2015

21.9K

Evaluation of Rodent Cage Processing Using Reduced Water Temperatures.

Mary M Walker1, Dianne M Harrison1, Toi A Collins1

  • 1University Laboratory Animal Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS
|June 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Lowering cage wash temperatures to 140°F effectively sanitizes animal cages, reducing energy costs. This study demonstrates that 140°F wash and rinse cycles are sufficient for cleaning and disinfection.

More Related Videos

A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining Cold Sensitivity and Adaptation in Mice
08:35

A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining Cold Sensitivity and Adaptation in Mice

Published on: March 17, 2015

15.2K
The Forced Swim Test as a Model of Depressive-like Behavior
05:42

The Forced Swim Test as a Model of Depressive-like Behavior

Published on: March 2, 2015

38.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 31, 2025

Morris Water Maze Test: Optimization for Mouse Strain and Testing Environment
10:24

Morris Water Maze Test: Optimization for Mouse Strain and Testing Environment

Published on: June 22, 2015

21.9K
A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining Cold Sensitivity and Adaptation in Mice
08:35

A Simple and Inexpensive Method for Determining Cold Sensitivity and Adaptation in Mice

Published on: March 17, 2015

15.2K
The Forced Swim Test as a Model of Depressive-like Behavior
05:42

The Forced Swim Test as a Model of Depressive-like Behavior

Published on: March 2, 2015

38.6K

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory animal science
  • Infectious disease control
  • Environmental hygiene

Background:

  • Previous studies suggested 143-180°F for cage sanitization.
  • Older methods may not reflect modern washing technology or cleaning challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate lower temperatures for effective cage sanitization.
  • To determine cost savings associated with optimized washing parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Tested 6 wash/rinse combinations (125°F, 140°F, 180°F) on soiled and autoclaved cages.
  • Used ATP detection and RODAC plates for microbial sampling.
  • Verified temperatures with data loggers.

Main Results:

  • 140°F wash (450s) and rinse (50s) effectively cleaned and disinfected cages.
  • Lower temperatures resulted in significant annual energy savings ($21,867.08 per washer).

Conclusions:

  • 140°F is sufficient for effective cage sanitization in animal facilities.
  • Optimized washing parameters reduce operational costs without compromising hygiene.