A Comment on and Correction to: Opinion Dynamics in the Presence of Increasing Agreement Pressure
Abstract:
We identify counterexamples to the consensus result given in Semonsen et al. (2018). We resolve the counterexamples by replacing Lemma 5 in the given reference with a novel variation of the Banach fixed-point theorem, which explains both the numerical results in the reference and the counterexample(s) in this note and provides a sufficient condition for consensus in systems with increasing peer-pressure. This work is relevant for other papers that have used the proof technique from Semonsen et al. and establishes the veracity of their claims assuming the new sufficient condition.
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Confirmation Biases
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Conformity


