Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
An alternative method for radioactivity measurement in quantitative bone SPECT/CT imaging
Masaru Ishihara1, Yasuaki Kato2, Masahisa Onoguchi3
1Department of Radiology, Hyogo Prefectural Kakogawa Medical Center, Kakogawa, Hyogo, Japan.
Quantitative bone SPECT/CT imaging for bone metastases can use fixed radiopharmaceutical radioactivity measurements as an alternative to direct measurement. This simplifies calculations, especially when direct measurement is missed, offering a viable alternative for standardized uptake value analysis.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Radiology
- Oncology
Background:
- Bone scintigraphy with combined single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) is crucial for detecting bone metastases.
- Calculating semi-quantitative standardized uptake values (SUV) typically requires precise pre- and post-injection radiopharmaceutical radioactivity measurements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of using fixed radiopharmaceutical radioactivity values as an alternative to measured values in quantitative SPECT/CT bone imaging.
- To compare different methods of quantifying Tc-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate input radioactivity for SUV analysis.
Main Methods:
- Four methods were compared: fully measured, pre-injection measured/post-injection fixed, pre-injection fixed/post-injection measured, and fully fixed radioactivity measurements.
- Semi-quantitative parameters (SUVpeak and SUVmean) were calculated and compared across all analytical methods using bone SPECT analysis software.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in SUVpeak and SUVmean were observed between certain measured and fixed radioactivity quantification methods (A vs. B, A vs. D, C vs. D).
- However, a subgroup analysis of patients with median post-injection radioactivity <1.5 MBq revealed no significant differences between any analytical methods.
Conclusions:
- Fixed radiopharmaceutical radioactivity measurement can serve as a practical alternative in quantitative bone SPECT/CT, particularly when direct measurement is challenging or missed.
- This simplified approach may streamline SUV calculations without compromising diagnostic accuracy in specific patient subgroups.
More Related Videos
08:04Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
Published on: March 11, 2017
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
X-ray Imaging
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...