Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

361
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
361
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

643
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
643
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

186
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
186
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

213
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
213
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

484
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
484
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

115
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
115

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid Onset of Response in Adults with Dermatomyositis Receiving Dazukibart: A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology·2026
Same author

Ibuzatrelvir potently reduced viral RNA levels despite a high rate of anti-S seropositivity: a post hoc analysis of serology of the phase 2b study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Improving transportability of regression calibration under the main/external validation study design.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

The effect of prenatal balanced energy and protein supplementation on small vulnerable newborn types in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

Statistical methods for clustered competing risk data when the event types are only available in a training dataset.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same author

Orolabial and Genital Herpes Clinical Trials: A Meta-analysis of Endpoints.

Open forum infectious diseases·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K

Statistical methods for analysis of combined biomarker data from multiple nested case-control studies.

Chao Cheng1, Abigail Sloan2, Molin Wang2,3,4

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|July 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new calibration methods to accurately pool biomarker data from multiple studies, addressing measurement errors. These methods improve the reliability of analyzing biomarker-disease associations, such as vitamin D and cancer risk.

Keywords:
Between-study variabilitycalibrationmeasurement errorpooling biomarker data

More Related Videos

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
07:41

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases

Published on: May 17, 2019

9.2K
Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.7K
Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
07:41

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases

Published on: May 17, 2019

9.2K
Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Biomarker Research

Background:

  • Pooling data across studies enhances statistical power for biomarker-disease association analyses.
  • Between-study variability in biomarker measurements requires adjustment, as reference laboratory values are not perfect.
  • Existing methods often over-rely on reference laboratory data, ignoring study-specific laboratory errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel calibration methods for pooling biomarker data from multiple studies.
  • To address both reference and study-specific laboratory measurement error and bias.
  • To improve the accuracy of pooled analyses of biomarker-disease associations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed two calibration methods: exact and approximate calibration.
  • Applied methods to nested or matched case-control studies with randomly selected controls for calibration.
  • Utilized simulation studies to assess the performance of the proposed calibration techniques.

Main Results:

  • The proposed calibration methods effectively adjust for between-study variability and laboratory measurement error.
  • Simulation studies demonstrated the empirical performance of both exact and approximate calibration methods.
  • Application to a real-world dataset confirmed the utility in evaluating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colorectal cancer risk.

Conclusions:

  • The developed calibration methods provide a robust framework for pooling biomarker data with measurement error.
  • Accurate adjustment for laboratory variability is crucial for reliable biomarker-disease association studies.
  • These methods enhance the precision and validity of findings in large-scale epidemiological research.