Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Emerging Technologies and Advanced Tools for Decoding Metabolomics Data Analysis
Published on: November 10, 2023
Network sampling coverage III: Imputation of missing network data under different network and missing data conditions
Jeffrey A Smith1, Jonathan H Morgan2, James Moody3
1University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States.
Abstract:
Missing data is a common, difficult problem for network studies. Unfortunately, there are few clear guidelines about what a researcher should do when faced with incomplete information. We take up this problem in the third paper of a three-paper series on missing network data. Here, we compare the performance of different imputation methods across a wide range of circumstances characterized in terms of measures, networks and missing data types. We consider a number of imputation methods, going from simple imputation to more complex model- based approaches. Overall, we find that listwise deletion is almost always the worst option, while choosing the best strategy can be difficult, as it depends on the type of missing data, the type of network and the measure of interest. We end the paper by offering a set of practical outputs that researchers can use to identify the best imputation choice for their particular research setting.
Related Concept Videos
Censoring Survival Data
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Random Error
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...

