Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing Intrathecal Gene Therapy Efficacy in Juvenile Rats
Published on: March 29, 2024
Reducing sedated lumbar punctures in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Torin W Waters1, David S Dickens1
1Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Insights
Reducing sedation for lumbar punctures in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients is feasible. This approach improves patient experience and lowers costs without compromising procedure success.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Quality Improvement Science
- Neuroanesthesiology
Background:
- Sedation for lumbar punctures (LPs) in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is standard practice.
- Concerns exist regarding long-term neurocognitive effects of propofol sedation.
- Pandemic-related COVID-19 testing added burdens to sedated procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reduce sedated LPs by 50% in pediatric ALL patients.
- To evaluate the feasibility and impact of an intervention promoting unsedated LPs.
- To compare outcomes, costs, and patient preferences for sedated versus unsedated LPs.
Main Methods:
- Quality improvement intervention with patient/family education and simulation.
- Transitioning selected patients to unsedated LPs.
- Collecting comparative data on cost, clinical time, and LP success rates.
Main Results:
- Percentage of sedated LPs decreased from 100% to 48%.
- All LPs were successful regardless of sedation.
- Unsedated LPs significantly reduced family clinical time and procedural costs.
Conclusions:
- Significantly reducing sedation for LPs in pediatric ALL patients is feasible.
- Unsedated LPs offer potential for improved health, patient experience, and cost savings.
- This approach enhances institutional efficiency and patient-centered care.
Background:
Sedation for lumbar punctures (LPs) in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients has been the standard for decades to reduce pain and anxiety. Recent studies on the potential long-term neurocognitive effects of cumulative propofol exposure have raised concerns about this practice. The recent pandemic introduced additional burdens to patients, with the requirement of a negative COVID-19 test prior to each sedated procedure.
Procedure:
These factors prompted a quality improvement intervention at our institution where we aimed to reduce postinduction sedated LPs by 50%. Our intervention included patient and family education, followed by a simulation of the procedure for selected patients. Those converted to unsedated LPs were queried for their preference. Comparative cost, clinical time, and LP success rates were collected for sedated and unsedated LPs.
Results:
Following the intervention, the percentage of LPs performed with sedation dropped from 100% to 48%. All LPs were successful using both techniques. Most patients who experienced the unsedated LP technique, and their guardians, strongly preferred this approach. Unsedated LPs significantly reduced clinical time (169 vs. 83 minutes) for families, decreased expenditures ($5736 reduction per procedure), and improved institutional opportunity cost due to a decrease in last-minute cancelations.
Conclusion:
We have shown that it is feasible to significantly reduce the use of sedation for LPs in patients with ALL, which has the potential to improve health and patient experience at a lower cost.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...

