Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

06:11
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Ovine Model
Published on: October 5, 2009
13.0K
Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Using Cervical Subtotal Discectomy Prosthesis
Jin Wo1, Zhenjing Lv2, Jing Wang3
1Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
|August 2, 2021
Summary
A novel cervical subtotal discectomy prosthesis (CSDP) shows biomechanical performance similar to intact spines, offering a potential alternative to traditional fusion. This study confirms its durability and effectiveness in non-human primates, with implantation technique influencing outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Spine Biomechanics
- Orthopedic Biomaterials
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) leads to adjacent segment degeneration due to lost mobility.
- Cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) presents alternatives but introduces issues like hypermobility and wear.
- A new cervical subtotal discectomy prosthesis (CSDP) was designed to control motion and reduce subsidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To biomechanically assess the novel CSDP using finite element analysis, in vitro friction-wear testing, and non-human primate implantation.
- To compare CSDP's biomechanics against an intact spine and a commercial prosthesis (Prestige LP).
- To evaluate the impact of implantation errors on CSDP's biomechanical performance.
Main Methods:
- Finite element (FE) analysis of C2-C7 spinal models with CSDP implantation (C5-C6) and comparison with Prestige LP.
- Calculation of range of motion (ROM), bone-implant stress, and facet joint forces under various loading conditions.
- In vitro friction-wear testing and implantation in non-human primates for durability and radiographic evaluation.
Main Results:
- CSDP FE models exhibited ROM close to intact models, with minimal changes in facet joint forces.
- Improper CSDP implantation (1 mm elevation) increased ROM and altered biomechanical parameters.
- Friction-wear tests showed minimal wear, and primate studies reported no subsidence, dislocation, or loosening.
Conclusions:
- CSDP demonstrates biomechanical parameters comparable to intact spines and superior to the Prestige LP prosthesis.
- Implantation accuracy is crucial for optimal CSDP performance, affecting ROM, stress, and joint forces.
- The CSDP shows promising durability and effectiveness, validated through in vitro and in vivo studies.