Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Using patient shielding - What is the risk?
1Glan Clwyd Hospital, Bodelwyddan, United Kingdom.
Patient contact shielding during X-rays is often ineffective and can overstate radiation risks. Establishing clear dose thresholds for shielding would improve consistency and public understanding of diagnostic imaging safety.
Area of Science:
- Radiological protection
- Medical imaging
- Public health
Background:
- Patient contact shielding is a long-standing practice in diagnostic X-ray examinations to protect radiosensitive organs.
- Evidence suggests this practice may be ineffective, counterproductive, and contribute to public overestimation of radiation hazards.
- Disparities in shielding application have prompted professional bodies to issue guidance, sparking debate on its necessity and criteria.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the criteria for using patient contact shielding in diagnostic X-ray examinations.
- To propose a more transparent and consistent approach to patient shielding recommendations.
- To address the disparity in shielding application and enhance clarity for healthcare professionals and patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing evidence on the effectiveness of patient contact shielding.
- Analysis of the decision-making process for implementing shielding, including risk assessment.
- Discussion of a proposed threshold for radiation dose and/or risk to guide shielding decisions.
Main Results:
- The current criteria for patient shielding are based on subjective risk assessments and reported effectiveness, leading to inconsistencies.
- A clear, stated threshold for dose and/or risk below which shielding is not required is suggested.
- Implementing such a threshold would improve uniformity and transparency in shielding practices.
Conclusions:
- Patient contact shielding practices require re-evaluation based on evidence and clear risk criteria.
- Establishing explicit dose/risk thresholds will enhance consistency, clarity, and public understanding of radiation safety in diagnostic imaging.
- This approach will facilitate the integration of future research into updated shielding guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Nuclear Power
Nuclear Fuels
Nuclear fuel consists of a fissile isotope, such as uranium-235, which must be present in sufficient quantity to provide a...
Biological Effects of Radiation
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

