Eco-Normalization: Evaluating the Longevity of an Innovation in Context

Area of Science:

• Educational research
• Implementation science
• Program evaluation

Background:

• Educational innovations often struggle with lasting implementation and meaningful change due to complex ecosystem dynamics.
• Current program evaluation models focusing on implementation fidelity offer limited insight into an innovation's long-term trajectory.
• A novel approach is needed to evaluate the foundational conditions for sustained change in educational settings.

Purpose of the Study:

• To critically review existing implementation science models.
• To develop a comprehensive framework for evaluating the longevity of educational innovations.
• To shift program evaluation focus from implementation snapshots to innovation trajectories.

Main Methods:

• Conducted a critical review of relevant models from implementation science.
• Synthesized concepts from Normalization Process Theory, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and Reflexive Monitoring in Action.
• Developed the Eco-Normalization framework, comprising 6 critical questions for assessing innovation longevity.

Main Results:

• The Eco-Normalization framework emphasizes the interaction between local institutional practices and innovation features for durable change.
• Normalization of an innovation depends on the interplay between grassroots efforts and overarching innovation goals.
• The framework provides 6 key questions to evaluate an innovation's potential for long-term success.

Conclusions:

• The Eco-Normalization model directs attention to the broader change ecosystem when evaluating educational innovations.
• It highlights ecosystem features that can either promote or impede the sustained success of innovations.
• This framework offers a more holistic approach to ensuring meaningful and lasting change from educational initiatives.