Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Pedro J Montano, Santiago Altieri

    Journal International De Bioethique Et D'Ethique Des Sciences
    |August 11, 2021
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Artavia Murillo v. Costa Rica ruling misinterprets the Convention by denying personhood from conception. Ethical treatment requires recognizing human life

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same author

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2020
    Same author

    [Chapter 2. Criminal and Criminological aspects about act N˚18.987 which legalize the abortion in Uruguay].

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2019
    Same author

    [Medical ethics committees in the MERCOSUR].

    Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics·2007
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    Same journal

    Chapter 4. Neurotechnologies: striking a balance between scientific progress and privacy

    Journal international de bioethique et d'ethique des sciences·2026
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Bioethics
    • Legal Philosophy
    • Human Rights Law

    Background:

    • The Artavia Murillo v. Costa Rica judgment challenges the established understanding of personhood and human life.
    • Ethical conduct is rooted in justice, which is based on reality and the intrinsic nature of the subject being treated.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the ethical and legal implications of the Artavia Murillo v. Costa Rica judgment.
    • To assert that human life possesses inherent dignity from conception, independent of legal personhood status.
    • To advocate for the principle of favoring life in bioethical and legal considerations.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of ethical principles, including justice and dignity.
    • Legal interpretation of the Inter-American Convention and its application to human life.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the concept of personhood in relation to the reality of human existence.
  • Main Results:

    • The judgment incorrectly interprets the Convention, implying personhood is not present from conception.
    • Human life, characterized by the capacity to will and understand, holds superior dignity and should be preserved and respected.
    • Ethical treatment necessitates preventing the destruction of human life and respecting its integrity and nature as an end in itself.

    Conclusions:

    • The concept of personhood is a consequence, not a prerequisite, of the special dignity of human life.
    • Outdated legal norms hinder the recognition of unborn life's status, despite scientific advancements.
    • Bioethics and law, guided by the principle of 'primum non nocere' (first, do no harm), must prioritize life, especially in cases of doubt.