Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Standardization and Best Practices for Advancing Lung Imaging Using 129Xe MRI
Published on: November 21, 2023
Hyperpolarized 129Xenon MRI Ventilation Defect Quantification via Thresholding and Linear Binning in Multiple
David J Roach1, Matthew M Willmering1, Joseph W Plummer1
1Center for Pulmonary Imaging Research, Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Quantifying ventilation defect percentage (VDP) using hyperpolarized gas MRI requires standardized methods. While N4ITK bias-field corrected 60% thresholding best separates disease from controls, linear binning captures subtle defects in milder lung conditions.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Quantitative MRI
Background:
- Standardized quantification of ventilation defect percentage (VDP) from hyperpolarized (HP) gas MRI is lacking for multi-site pediatric and adult pulmonary disease trials.
- Current HP gas MRI research often focuses on single diseases with disease-specific VDP quantification methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare different VDP quantification methods from HP 129Xe MRI.
- To identify the most sensitive and specific methods for VDP assessment across various pulmonary diseases.
Main Methods:
- HP 129Xe MRI was performed on 176 subjects (pediatric and adult) with conditions including CF, LAM, asthma, sJIA, ILD, and BMT recipients, plus healthy controls.
- Five VDP quantification schemes were compared: linear binning and thresholding (≤60%, ≤75%) with different bias-field corrections (linear, N4ITK).
Main Results:
- All methods identified defects similarly, with lower VDPs in controls than most patient groups (p<0.05).
- N4ITK bias-field corrected 60% thresholding showed the highest efficacy in distinguishing combined disease from controls (VDP cut-point 2.3%).
- Linear binning better identified subtle low-ventilation regions in milder conditions like asthma compared to thresholding methods.
Conclusions:
- No single VDP quantification method is universally superior across all pulmonary diseases.
- N4ITK 60% thresholding excels at differentiating disease from health, while linear binning captures subtle ventilation changes.
- A consensus on VDP quantification is needed for future multi-center clinical trials, considering the nuanced advantages of each method.
More Related Videos
02:09Multi-modal Pulmonary Imaging: Using Complementary Information from CT and Hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI to Evaluate Lung Structure-Function
Published on: April 12, 2024
08:23Author Spotlight: Advancing Lung Disease Research with Free-Breathing Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI
Published on: November 10, 2023