Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
New polynomial regression formula to improve second-eye refractive outcomes in sequential bilateral cataract surgery
Édouard Klein1, François Malecaze, Victor Bart
1Ophthalmology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France (Klein, Malecaze, Fournié); Kynapse Inc., Levallois-Perret, France (Bart, Barnoud); Private Practice, Helios Ophthalmology, Saint Jean De Luz, France (Gauthier); Private Practice, Ophthalmology Center of Arceaux and Clinique de la vision, Montpellier, France (Lévy).
Purpose:
To assess a new polynomial regression formula integrating the refractive prediction error of the first-operated eye to improve the intraocular lens power calculation of the second eye in cataract surgery.
Setting:
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Toulouse, France.
Design:
Retrospective multicentric dataset study.
Methods:
A polynomial regression formula, WeOptimeye2nd (WO2nd), was developed using a machine-learning algorithm trained on a dataset of 534 patients who underwent sequential bilateral cataract surgery. A separate multicentric dataset was used to retrospectively calculate predicted refraction with WO2nd, SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formulas, and 3 other methods of constant factors (CFs) second-eye refinement (CF0.38, CF0.35, and CF0.5). Mean absolute errors (MAEs) and percentage of eyes within ±0.25, ±0.5, and ±1.0 diopter (D) from predicted spherical equivalent were compared between formulas.
Results:
The study comprised data on 722 patients. In the overall population, WO2nd had the lowest MAE: 0.339 vs 0.347 (P = .137), 0.340 (P = .956), 0.350 (P = .066), 0.399 (P < .001), and 0.410 (P < .001), with CF0.38, CF0.5, and CF0.35, Barrett II, and SRK/T, respectively. WO2nd had the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.5 D of the predicted refraction, and the difference was statistically significant vs SRK/T and Barrett II formulas but not vs CF0.38, CF0.5, and CF0.35. WO2nd performed the best in axial length (AL) < 22 mm with the lowest MAE and a statistically significant difference vs any other formula.
Conclusions:
WO2nd improved the refractive outcome of the second-operated eye and performed well in extreme AL and mean keratometry subgroups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Focusing of Light in the Eye

