Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Law of Independent Assortment

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.

Dihybrid Crosses

Dihybrid Crosses

Monohybrid Crosses

Monohybrid Crosses

Law of Segregation

Law of Segregation

When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Association between urban life-years and cardiometabolic risk: the Indian migration study.

American journal of epidemiology·2011

Same author

Mendelian randomization: the use of genes in instrumental variable analyses.

Health economics·2011

Same author

Socioeconomic inequalities in height, leg length and trunk length among children aged 6.5 years and their parents from the Republic of Belarus: evidence from the Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT).

Annals of human biology·2011

Same author

Genetic variation at CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 interacts with smoking status to influence body mass index.

International journal of epidemiology·2011

Same author

Maternal and offspring adiposity-related genetic variants and gestational weight gain.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2011

Same author

Is relative leg length a biomarker of childhood nutrition? Long-term follow-up of the Hyderabad Nutrition Trial.

International journal of epidemiology·2011

Same journal

The Biology of Malaria Parasite Liver Infection.

Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine·2026

Same journal

The Interaction between Diabetes Mellitus and Tuberculosis: Epidemiology, Screening, and Clinical Management.

Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine·2026

Same journal

New Malaria Prevention Modalities: Long-Acting Interventions Beyond Vaccines.

Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine·2026

Same journal

From Parasite to Pill: Harnessing Biology for Breakthroughs in Antimalarial Drug Discovery.

Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine·2026

Same journal

Malaria Parasite Genomics: Decentralization, Diversification, and Development Goals.

Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine·2026

Same journal

Tuberculosis Infection: Diagnosis and Management.

Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Published on: May 15, 2018

Mendelian Randomization: Concepts and Scope.

Rebecca C Richmond^1,2, George Davey Smith^1,2,3

¹MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, United Kingdom.

Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine

|August 24, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants to infer causal links between exposures and outcomes. This method offers a less biased approach than traditional epidemiology for understanding health and economic factors.

More Related Videos

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Published on: August 15, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Published on: May 15, 2018

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia

Published on: June 15, 2011

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information

Published on: August 15, 2019

Area of Science:

Genetics
Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful epidemiological tool.
It leverages genetic variants to investigate causal relationships between exposures and outcomes.
MR minimizes confounding by using randomly inherited genetic variants.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a comprehensive overview of Mendelian randomization (MR).
To detail the scope, applications, and methodological underpinnings of MR.
To discuss strategies for addressing assumption violations and future directions.

Main Methods:

Utilizes genetic variants as instrumental variables for exposures.
Employs statistical methods to estimate causal effects.
Compares MR with conventional epidemiological approaches to highlight reduced bias.

Main Results:

MR enables robust causal inference for modifiable exposures.
Increasing availability of genetic data expands MR applications.
The method offers a less confounded and biased estimation of exposure-outcome effects.

Conclusions:

MR is a valuable method for causal inference in health, social, and economic research.
Methodological advancements and data availability enhance MR's utility.
Future prospects include broader clinical applicability and generalizability.