Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Detecting and Characterizing Protein Self-Assembly In Vivo by Flow Cytometry
Published on: July 17, 2019
Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14-CAPRI experiment
Marc F Lensink1, Guillaume Brysbaert1, Théo Mauri1
1CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology, University of Lille, Lille, France.
The CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge (Round 50) evaluated 12 targets. While top groups improved model submission rates, high accuracy decreased, though scorers and some servers showed strong performance.
Area of Science:
- Computational Biology
- Structural Biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- The Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI) challenge assesses protein assembly prediction accuracy.
- CAPRI Round 50 was the fourth joint challenge with the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP).
- This round included 12 targets: 6 dimers, 3 trimers, and 3 higher-order oligomers, with varying difficulty based on template availability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of computational methods in predicting protein complex structures.
- To assess the accuracy of protein assembly predictions in the fourth joint CASP-CAPRI challenge.
- To identify advances in protein assembly prediction methodologies.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-five CAPRI groups, including eight automatic servers, submitted approximately 1250 models per target.
- Twenty groups, including six servers, participated in the scoring challenge, submitting around 190 models per target.
- Model accuracy was assessed using standard CAPRI criteria and a weighted scoring scheme evaluating top-ranking models.
Main Results:
- Top-performing groups submitted acceptable or better models for 70-75% of targets, an increase from previous rounds, but with lower high-accuracy rates.
- Scorer groups demonstrated improved performance, with more groups submitting correct models for 70-80% of targets or achieving high accuracy.
- Automatic servers generally underperformed, with MDOCKPP and LZERD being notable exceptions, matching human group performance.
Conclusions:
- Protein assembly prediction has seen methodological advances, though achieving high accuracy remains challenging.
- Scoring methods show improved effectiveness in evaluating protein complex predictions.
- While general server performance lagged, specific servers achieved competitive results, indicating progress in automated structure prediction.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Complex Assembly
Assembly of Cytoskeletal Filaments
Coat Assembly and GTPases
Coat assembly depends on the local availability of phosphatidylinositol phosphates or PIPs and GTP-binding proteins. Adaptor proteins, which link the coat proteins to the membrane, bind to these PIPs and play a crucial role in controlling...
Protein Folding
Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
Generation of Straight or Branched Actin Filaments
Arp2/3 Complex
Arp2/3 complex is a seven-subunit complex consisting of two proteins similar to actin- Arp2 and Arp3, and five other subunits that help keep Arp2 and Arp3 inactive. When required, the complex is...

