Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Subconsciousness and No Awareness01:15

Subconsciousness and No Awareness

418
The concept of subconscious awareness refers to the processing of information below the level of conscious thought, which significantly influences both behaviors and decisions. It is also known as waking subconscious awareness. This complex level of cognition operates without the direct awareness of the individual, facilitating rapid and simultaneous handling of multiple information streams.
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
418
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

444
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
444
Repressed Memory01:16

Repressed Memory

205
Repressed memories are a psychological phenomenon where memories of traumatic events are unconsciously blocked from a person's awareness. This process occurs as a defense mechanism, protecting the mind from the emotional impact of distressing or painful experiences. For example, a person who has experienced childhood trauma may grow up with no conscious recollection of the event. In such cases, the memories are thought to be buried deep within the subconscious, inaccessible to the conscious...
205

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learned statistical regularity modulates anticipatory micro-saccades toward suppressed distractor locations.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

35+ years of the additional singleton task: Design features and guidelines.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Dynamic competition between bottom-up saliency and top-down goals in early visual cortex.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Incidental learning of time-event relationships across processing stages.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Learning alters salience and proactive attentional priority.

Communications psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K

Attentional suppression in time and space.

Zhenzhen Xu1, Sander A Los1, Jan Theeuwes1

  • 1Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People can learn to ignore distracting objects by suppressing their likely locations and appearance times. This study shows that temporal learning enhances attentional suppression, improving focus.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.2K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 20, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.2K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • Distraction can be mitigated by learning to suppress salient object locations.
  • Prior research focused on spatial suppression, leaving temporal suppression less explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if attentional suppression can be tuned to the timing of distractor appearance.
  • To determine if temporal learning influences the effectiveness of spatial suppression.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed the additional singleton task, searching for a shape amidst a color singleton distractor.
  • Distractor presentation varied in timing (short/long intervals) and location probability.
  • Distractor locations were biased to appear after specific intervals.

Main Results:

  • Attentional capture by distractors was reduced at high-probability locations.
  • This suppression effect was significantly stronger when distractors appeared at their expected location after the associated time interval.
  • Temporal learning enhanced spatial suppression effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Individuals learn to suppress distractors not only based on location but also on the time of their likely appearance.
  • Attentional suppression is dynamically modulated by temporal cues, adjusting the spatial priority map.
  • This suggests a sophisticated, time-sensitive mechanism for managing visual attention and reducing distraction.