Gastroenterology Clinical Trials Transparency: An Analysis of Publication Rates From the ClinicalTrials.gov Database

Shashank Garg1, Anam Rizvi2, Diana Wee3

  • 1Division of Gastroenteorlogy, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Most gastroenterology clinical trials report results, but few post them on ClinicalTrials.gov. Improving clinical trial transparency in gastroenterology is essential for research integrity.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Research Transparency

Background:

  • Limited information exists regarding the transparency of clinical trials in gastroenterology.
  • Ensuring transparency in clinical research is crucial for public trust and scientific advancement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the transparency of clinical trials for common gastrointestinal diseases.
  • To evaluate the adherence to reporting results for gastroenterology trials.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic search of the ClinicalTrials.gov database was conducted for trials related to prevalent gastrointestinal diseases up to August 2018.
  • Data on trial characteristics and results reporting (via ClinicalTrials.gov or publication) were collected for each trial.

Main Results:

  • Out of 2,429 analyzed trials, 75% had results available either on ClinicalTrials.gov or in publications.
  • However, only 29% of these trials had their results posted directly on the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Conclusions:

  • A significant gap exists in the reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov within the field of gastroenterology.
  • Enhancing clinical trial transparency in gastroenterology is necessary to ensure comprehensive data accessibility and research accountability.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
9.8K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.9K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
299
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
201
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
25
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
31