Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

5.8K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.8K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

333
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
333
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.9K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

9.3K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
9.3K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.4K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.4K
Quantifying Work02:30

Quantifying Work

22.3K
As a system undergoes a change, its internal energy can change, and energy can be transferred from the system to the surroundings, or from the surroundings to the system. 
22.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence of diplopia among giant cell arteritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same author

Comparing Ophthalmologist and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

Oculoplastics and Augmented Intelligence: A Literature Review.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Prevalence of phantom eye syndrome following eye removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Reply: Ultrasound vs. Biopsy for Giant Cell Arteritis: Discussion in Point Counter-Point in the June 2024 Issue of the Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology.

Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society·2025
Same author

Ectropion Repair Techniques and the Role of Adjunctive Superotemporal Skin Transposition for Tarsal Ectropion.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

505

A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process to Quantify Authorship.

Edsel B Ing1

  • 1University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Advances in Medical Education and Practice
|September 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary

A new scoring rubric quantifies the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors criteria for authorship. This system objectively assesses contributions, aiming to reduce authorship disputes and ensure fair credit in academic medicine.

Keywords:
ICMJEacademic medicineanalytic hierarchy processauthorshipethicsmedical editorssurvey

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.7K
Author Spotlight: Optimizing Dendritic Spine Analysis for Balanced Manual and Automated Assessment in the Hippocampus CA1 Apical Dendrites
07:45

Author Spotlight: Optimizing Dendritic Spine Analysis for Balanced Manual and Automated Assessment in the Hippocampus CA1 Apical Dendrites

Published on: September 27, 2024

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

505
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.7K
Author Spotlight: Optimizing Dendritic Spine Analysis for Balanced Manual and Automated Assessment in the Hippocampus CA1 Apical Dendrites
07:45

Author Spotlight: Optimizing Dendritic Spine Analysis for Balanced Manual and Automated Assessment in the Hippocampus CA1 Apical Dendrites

Published on: September 27, 2024

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Academic Medicine
  • Scholarly Publishing
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • Authorship in academic medicine often involves collaboration and mentorship.
  • The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors criteria (ICMJEc) are widely used to prevent authorship abuses.
  • Existing binary ICMJEc lack a quantifiable method for assessing contributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a numeric scoring rubric for the ICMJEc.
  • To create a quantifiable system for corroborating authorship claims.
  • To provide an objective method for assessing authorship contributions.

Main Methods:

  • The four ICMJEc were divided into nine components: conception, design, data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, draft, revision, final approval, and accountability.
  • Medical editors rated the importance of each component using an 11-point Likert scale.
  • An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to calculate priority weights, which were combined with perceived effort/capability grades to derive an authorship score.

Main Results:

  • Sixty-six medical editors participated in the survey.
  • Accountability (31.8%) and final approval (20.1%) received the highest AHP weights.
  • Data acquisition had the lowest median importance score (3.6%).

Conclusions:

  • The developed scoring rubric transforms the binary ICMJEc into quantifiable components.
  • This system offers a transparent method for objectively assessing authorship contributions and order.
  • The rubric has the potential to decrease authorship abuses in academic publishing.