Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2025

09:57
How to Measure Cortical Folding from MR Images: a Step-by-Step Tutorial to Compute Local Gyrification Index
Published on: January 2, 2012
28.2K
Reproducibility of Longitudinal Changes in Cortical Thickness Determined by Surface-Based Morphometry Between
Hidemasa Takao1, Shiori Amemiya1, Osamu Abe1
1Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI
|September 23, 2021
Summary
Accelerated MRI improves scan time but may affect brain structure analysis. Reproducibility of longitudinal cortical thickness changes varies between non-accelerated and accelerated imaging across healthy elderly, MCI, and AD patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Radiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Accelerated MRI techniques reduce scan times but may compromise signal-to-noise ratio and image quality.
- The impact of accelerated imaging on the reproducibility of longitudinal brain structure analysis, particularly cortical thickness, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the reproducibility of longitudinal cortical thickness changes using surface-based morphometry.
- To compare non-accelerated and accelerated T1-weighted MRI in healthy elderly, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) populations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study analyzing 2-year interval MRI data from 50 healthy elderly, 54 MCI, and 8 AD patients.
- Cortical thickness was estimated using FreeSurfer's longitudinal stream.
- Image quality was visually assessed by three radiologists.
Main Results:
- Reproducibility, measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), varied across groups and brain regions (overall mean ICC=0.45).
- Mean ICC was 0.33 for healthy elderly, 0.49 for MCI, and 0.31 for AD patients.
- Within-subject variability in cortical thickness changes was similar in healthy elderly (1.3%/year) and MCI (1.3%/year) but higher in AD patients (1.7%/year). Image quality was comparable across groups.
Conclusions:
- Reproducibility of longitudinal cortical thickness measurements differs between non-accelerated and accelerated MRI.
- The variability in reproducibility is influenced by disease status (MCI, AD) and specific brain regions.
- Accelerated MRI shows potential for longitudinal studies but requires careful consideration of disease-specific effects.

