Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

5.8K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
5.8K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

611
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
611
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.9K
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

374
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
374
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient01:17

Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient

1.1K
The extended Debye-Hückel equation indicates that the activity coefficient of an ion in an aqueous solution at 25°C depends on three partially interdependent properties: the ionic strength of the solution, the charge of the ion, and the ion size. 
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
1.1K
Central Tendency: Analysis01:10

Central Tendency: Analysis

270
Measures of central tendency are tools used in biostatistics to identify the average or center of a dataset. They offer a single representative value for understanding and summarizing data distribution.
The mean is one such measure, calculated by totaling all values in a dataset and dividing by the number of values. For instance, the mean blood pressure reading (120, 130, 140, 150) would be 135. However, the mean can be affected by extreme values or outliers.
The median, another measure,...
270

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fitting Curves and Surfaces with Monotonic and Non-Monotonic Four Parameter Equations.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

The Regression Analysis of Collinear Data.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

Ruggedness Testing-Part I: Ignoring Interactions.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

Ruggedness Testing-Part II: Recognizing Interactions.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

Effect of Variables on pH Measurement in Acid-Rain-Like Solutions as Determined by Ruggedness Tests.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

An Interlaboratory Test of pH Measurements in Rainwater.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same journal

A Graph Coloring Algorithm for Large Scheduling Problems.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same journal

Generators for Discrete Polynomial L<sub>1</sub> Approximation Problems.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same journal

Room Temperature Poling of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride) with Deposited Metal Electrodes.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same journal

Molecular Dynamics Study of Liquid Rubidium and the Lennard-Jones Fluid.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same journal

Isoionic Isotope Exchange with Hydroxylapatite and the Dilution Effect.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same journal

Observations of Surface Changes in Platinum Crucibles.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Consensus Values and Weighting Factors.

Robert C Paule1, John Mandel1

  • 1National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC 20234.

Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)
|September 27, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a statistical method for analyzing data from multiple experiments. It calculates a consensus value by accounting for within-group and between-group variability, improving experimental design.

Keywords:
ANOVA (within-between)components of varianceconsensus valuesdesign of experimentspooling of varianceweighted averageweighted least squares regression

More Related Videos

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.1K
Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 19, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.1K
Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Statistical Analysis
  • Experimental Design
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Analyzing data from multiple experiments presents challenges in accounting for varied sources of error.
  • Existing methods may not adequately address both within-group and between-group variabilities simultaneously.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust statistical method for combining data from multiple experiments.
  • To calculate a precise consensus value by incorporating experimental variability.
  • To provide insights for optimizing future experimental designs.

Main Methods:

  • A novel statistical analysis method is presented for multi-experiment datasets.
  • It quantifies and weights both within-group and between-group variabilities.
  • An iterative technique using truncated Taylor series expansion is employed for calculations.

Main Results:

  • The method calculates optimal weighting factors based on observed variabilities.
  • It determines a "best" consensus value, applicable to weighted averages or least squares regression.
  • The approach is computationally straightforward and programmable for desktop computers.

Conclusions:

  • This method offers a statistically sound approach to data aggregation from multiple experiments.
  • It enhances understanding of experimental variability, aiding in the design of more efficient future studies.
  • The technique provides a reliable way to establish consensus values from diverse datasets.