Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gene-Environment Interactions01:20

Gene-Environment Interactions

693
Gene expression is a dynamic process that is significantly influenced by environmental factors. This interaction underlies the complex nature of biological development and the phenotypic differences observed among individuals, even among those with identical genetic makeups. Factors such as radiation, temperature, behavior, nutrition, and stress play pivotal roles in determining how genes are expressed. The concept of the reaction range is central to understanding this interaction. It posits...
693
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

669
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
669
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

546
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
546
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

4.8K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
4.8K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.3K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.3K
Problem-Solving: Tuning of a Guitar String01:04

Problem-Solving: Tuning of a Guitar String

689
In the case of stringed instruments like the guitar, the elastic property that determines the speed of the sound produced is its linear mass density or the mass per unit length. This is simply called the linear density. If the string's linear density is constant along the string, then the linear density is simply the total mass divided by the total length.
The string's wave speed can be regulated by varying the linear density. Tension is the other property that determines the speed of...
689

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Forecasting Perception Before It Happens: Context-Specific Connectivity Patterns Predict Perceptual Outcomes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Studying unconscious processing: Contention and consensus.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Investigating masked priming along the "vision-for-perception" and "vision-for-action" dimensions of unconscious processing.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2018
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.1K

Musicality as a predictive process.

Nils Kraus1,2, Guido Hesselmann1

  • 1Department of General and Biological Psychology, Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, 10179Berlin, Germanyn.kraus@phb.de.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|September 30, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study contrasts the social bonding theory of musicality with predictive processing models. It suggests music enjoyment arises from minimizing prediction errors in cognitive functioning.

More Related Videos

fMRI Mapping of Brain Activity Associated with the Vocal Production of Consonant and Dissonant Intervals
11:15

fMRI Mapping of Brain Activity Associated with the Vocal Production of Consonant and Dissonant Intervals

Published on: May 23, 2017

7.3K
Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

13.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 18, 2025

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.1K
fMRI Mapping of Brain Activity Associated with the Vocal Production of Consonant and Dissonant Intervals
11:15

fMRI Mapping of Brain Activity Associated with the Vocal Production of Consonant and Dissonant Intervals

Published on: May 23, 2017

7.3K
Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

13.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Music Cognition

Background:

  • The evolutionary origins of musicality are debated.
  • Savage et al. propose social bonding as the primary driver for music's evolution.
  • Alternative frameworks for understanding music cognition are needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an alternative perspective on the evolution of musicality.
  • To highlight the role of predictive processing in music production and enjoyment.
  • To contrast social bonding theories with prediction error minimization principles.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of existing literature.
  • Integration of predictive processing frameworks with music cognition.
  • Comparative analysis of evolutionary and cognitive models of musicality.

Main Results:

  • Predictive processing offers a mechanistic explanation for music cognition.
  • Music production and enjoyment can be understood through prediction error minimization.
  • This framework contrasts with purely social bonding explanations.

Conclusions:

  • Predictive processing provides a robust model for understanding musicality.
  • Music's cognitive functions are deeply intertwined with fundamental principles of brain function.
  • Future research should explore the interplay between social and predictive mechanisms in music evolution.