Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2025

Isolation of Mouse Interstitial Valve Cells to Study the Calcification of the Aortic Valve In Vitro
Published on: May 10, 2021
Plasma biomarkers associated with adverse outcomes in patients with calcific aortic stenosis
Mahesh K Vidula1, Alena Orlenko2, Lei Zhao3
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Insights
Plasma biomarkers, particularly those indicating inflammation and calcification, effectively predict adverse outcomes in aortic stenosis (AS) patients. Machine learning models integrating these markers improve risk stratification for better patient management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarker Discovery
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Enhanced risk stratification is crucial for managing patients with aortic stenosis (AS).
- Identifying patients at high risk for adverse outcomes, including myocardial damage, is essential for tailored management.
- Current risk assessment may not fully capture the complexity of AS progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify specific plasma biomarkers associated with adverse outcomes in patients with AS.
- To develop multimarker profiles using machine learning for improved risk prediction.
- To investigate the prognostic value of inflammation and calcification biomarkers in AS.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 708 patients with calcific AS was analyzed.
- 49 plasma biomarkers were measured using a Luminex platform.
- Machine learning algorithms were employed to develop multimarker models for predicting death and death or heart failure-related hospital admission (DHFA).
Main Results:
- Multiple biomarkers, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), were significantly predictive of death and DHFA.
- Machine-learning models integrating multiple biomarkers demonstrated strong associations with adverse outcomes.
- Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and FGF-23 emerged as the most important biomarkers in the predictive models.
Conclusions:
- Plasma biomarkers are significantly associated with the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with AS.
- Biomarkers related to inflammation (e.g., IL-6) and calcification (e.g., FGF-23) are strongly linked to prognosis.
- These findings support the use of plasma biomarkers for improved risk stratification in AS management.
Aims:
Enhanced risk stratification of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is necessary to identify patients at high risk for adverse outcomes, and may allow for better management of patient subgroups at high risk of myocardial damage. The objective of this study was to identify plasma biomarkers and multimarker profiles associated with adverse outcomes in AS.
Methods And Results:
We studied 708 patients with calcific AS and measured 49 biomarkers using a Luminex platform. We studied the correlation between biomarkers and the risk of (i) death and (ii) death or heart failure-related hospital admission (DHFA). We also utilized machine-learning methods (a tree-based pipeline optimizer platform) to develop multimarker models associated with the risk of death and DHFA. In this cohort with a median follow-up of 2.8 years, multiple biomarkers were significantly predictive of death in analyses adjusted for clinical confounders, including tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α [hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, P < 0.0001], TNF receptor 1 (TNFRSF1A; HR 1.38, P < 0.0001), fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 (HR 1.22, P < 0.0001), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (HR 1.58, P < 0.0001), matrix metalloproteinase-7 (HR 1.24, P = 0.0002), syndecan-1 (HR 1.27, P = 0.0002), suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (ST2) (IL1RL1; HR 1.22, P = 0.0002), interleukin (IL)-8 (CXCL8; HR 1.22, P = 0.0005), pentraxin (PTX)-3 (HR 1.17, P = 0.001), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (LCN2; HR 1.18, P < 0.0001), osteoprotegerin (OPG) (TNFRSF11B; HR 1.26, P = 0.0002), and endostatin (COL18A1; HR 1.28, P = 0.0012). Several biomarkers were also significantly predictive of DHFA in adjusted analyses including FGF-23 (HR 1.36, P < 0.0001), TNF-α (HR 1.26, P < 0.0001), TNFR1 (HR 1.34, P < 0.0001), angiopoietin-2 (HR 1.26, P < 0.0001), syndecan-1 (HR 1.23, P = 0.0006), ST2 (HR 1.27, P < 0.0001), IL-8 (HR 1.18, P = 0.0009), PTX-3 (HR 1.18, P = 0.0002), OPG (HR 1.20, P = 0.0013), and NT-proBNP (HR 1.63, P < 0.0001). Machine-learning multimarker models were strongly associated with adverse outcomes (mean 1-year probability of death of 0%, 2%, and 60%; mean 1-year probability of DHFA of 0%, 4%, 97%; P < 0.0001). In these models, IL-6 (a biomarker of inflammation) and FGF-23 (a biomarker of calcification) emerged as the biomarkers of highest importance.
Conclusions:
Plasma biomarkers are strongly associated with the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with AS. Biomarkers of inflammation and calcification were most strongly related to prognosis.
More Related Videos
08:43Calcification of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Imaging of Aortic Calcification and Inflammation
Published on: May 31, 2016
04:30Investigating Aortic Valve Calcification via Isolation and Culture of T Lymphocytes using Feeder Cells from Irradiated Buffy Coat
Published on: February 4, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management