Natural History of Brainstem Cavernous Malformations: On the Variation in Hemorrhage Rates

Yang Yang1, Julia Velz2, Marian C Neidert3

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacher St. Gallen, Switzerland.

World Neurosurgery
|October 17, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Hemorrhage rates for brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs) vary due to different calculation methods. This study clarifies these rates, finding them consistent with literature, with long-term rates falling between prospective and retrospective values.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Vascular Malformations

Background:

  • Brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs) management has variable reported hemorrhage rates.
  • Previous studies lack a standardized method for calculating BSCM hemorrhage risk.
  • Understanding hemorrhage variation is crucial for effective BSCM management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reasons for variability in reported hemorrhage rates of conservatively managed BSCMs.
  • To present hemorrhage rate data from a decade of BSCM management experience.
  • To compare findings with existing literature on BSCM hemorrhage.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective and prospective analysis of 78 patients with BSCMs managed between 2006-2018.
  • Definition of hemorrhagic events based on radiographic verification.
  • Calculation of annual hemorrhage rates (retrospective and prospective) and literature review.

Main Results:

  • Retrospective hemorrhage rate was 1.9% per year; prospective rate was 11.9% per year in the study cohort.
  • Literature review showed retrospective rates from 1.9% to 6.8% and prospective rates from 4.1% to 21.5%.
  • Study findings align with reported literature rates, confirming calculation method influence.

Conclusions:

  • Hemorrhage rate calculations differ significantly based on retrospective vs. prospective methodologies.
  • The long-term hemorrhage rate for BSCMs is likely situated between the prospective and retrospective estimates.
  • Standardized reporting is needed to reduce variability in BSCM hemorrhage data.
Abstract