Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

704
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
704
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

218
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
218
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

345
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
345
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

434
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
434
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

343
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
343
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

304
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
304

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Causal K-Means Clustering.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology·2026
Same author

Thirty-Day Readmission After Hospitalisation for Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Nationwide Analysis.

Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society·2026
Same author

Differential Impact of a Digital Mental Health Engagement Platform on Black and Female Health Care Workers: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

A causal framework for evaluating drivers of policy effect heterogeneity using difference-in-differences.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same author

Perspectives of female and under-represented physicians on well-being in medicine: a qualitative study from an academic medical centre in the USA.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Digital phenotyping and ASCVD risk: An exploratory cross-sectional analysis using online behavioral data.

American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.4K

Doubly robust nonparametric instrumental variable estimators for survival outcomes.

Youjin Lee1, Edward H Kennedy2, Nandita Mitra3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|October 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces new instrumental variable (IV) methods for survival outcomes, addressing unmeasured confounding in causal inference. The flexible, double-robust estimators handle censored data, improving causal effect estimation for survival analysis.

Keywords:
CensoringInstrumental variableLocal average treatment effectNonparametric estimation

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 16, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • Unmeasured confounding is a major challenge in causal inference.
  • Existing instrumental variable (IV) methods are limited for censored survival outcomes.
  • Developing robust methods for survival data is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose novel nonparametric estimators for local average treatment effect on survival probabilities.
  • To address both covariate-dependent and outcome-dependent censoring.
  • To provide efficient and flexible IV methods for survival data.

Main Methods:

  • Developed efficient influence function-based estimators.
  • Proposed simple estimation procedures for binary or continuous instrumental variables.
  • Incorporated machine learning tools for nonparametric estimation.
  • Ensured double-robustness properties of the estimators.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated flexibility and double robustness in simulation studies under various scenarios.
  • Successfully applied the method to the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.
  • Estimated the causal effect of screening on survival probabilities.
  • Investigated causal contrasts under different censoring assumptions.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed nonparametric IV estimators effectively address unmeasured confounding in censored survival outcomes.
  • The methods offer flexibility and double robustness, enhancing causal inference in survival analysis.
  • Applicable to real-world health studies for estimating treatment effects on survival.